Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Complexities of Achilles Tendon Injuries — Research and Future Directions
Published on: October 27, 2023
Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography
Mitsuyoshi Murayama1, Kazunori Nosaka2, Takayuki Inami3
1Institute of Physical Education, Keio University, 4-1-1, Hiyoshi, Kouhoku-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 223-8521, Japan. murayama@keio.jp.
Abstract:
This study investigated the relationship between push-in meter (PM) and ultrasound strain elastography (USE) for biceps brachii (BB) muscle hardness. BB hardness of 21 young men was assessed by PM and USE during rest and isometric contractions of six different intensities (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90% of maximal voluntary contraction: MVC) at 30°, 60° and 90° elbow flexion. Muscle hardness (E) was calculated from the force-displacement relationship in PM, and strain ratio (SR) between an acoustic coupler (elastic modulus: 22.6 kPa) and different regions of interest (ROIs) in BB was calculated and converted to Young's modulus (YM) in USE. In resting muscle, E was 26.1 ± 6.4 kPa, and SR and YM for the whole BB was 0.88 ± 0.4 and 30.8 ± 12.8 kPa, respectively. A significant (p < 0.01) correlation was evident between E and logarithmical transformed SR (LTSR) for the ROI of whole BB (r = - 0.626), and E and converted YM (r = 0.615). E increased approximately ninefold from resting to 90% MVC, and E and LTSR (r = - 0.732 to - 0.880), and E and converted YM for the SR above 0.1 were correlated (r = 0.599-0.768, p < 0.01). These results suggest that muscle hardness values obtained by PM and USE are comparable.

