Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnosing human malformation patterns with a microcomputer: evaluation of two different algorithms.

D F Schorderet1

  • 1Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

American Journal of Medical Genetics
|October 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prominent Optic Disc Featured in Inherited Retinopathy.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2017
Same author

Preserved functional and structural integrity of the papillomacular area correlates with better visual acuity in retinitis pigmentosa.

Eye (London, England)·2016
Same author

A Novel Recessive RPGRIP1 Mutation Causing Leber Congenital Amaurosis.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2016
Same author

Swiss Family with Dominant Stargardt Disease Caused by a Recurrent Mutation in the ELOVL4 Gene.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2016
Same author

Potential blindness in children of patients with hereditary bone disease.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2015
Same author

Molecular Analysis of NOTCH2 in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2015
Same journal

Abstracts for the Xth World Congress of Psychiatric Genetics. Brussels, Belgium, 9-13 October 2002.

American journal of medical genetics·2003
Same journal

Defects of blastogenesis.

American journal of medical genetics·2002
Same journal

Malformations of the craniofacial region: evolutionary, embryonic, genetic, and clinical perspectives.

American journal of medical genetics·2002
Same journal

Limb anomalies: Developmental and evolutionary aspects.

American journal of medical genetics·2002
Same journal

Molecular etiology of gut malformations and diseases.

American journal of medical genetics·2002
Same journal

Status of the human malformation map: 2002.

American journal of medical genetics·2002
See all related articles

A new descriptive algorithm for diagnosing human malformation patterns shows accuracy comparable to the pseudo-Bayesian approach. This method aids in identifying rare syndromes by assigning equal weight to anomalies.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Genetics
  • Computational Biology
  • Clinical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Differential diagnosis of human malformation patterns is complex.
  • Existing microcomputer-aided systems like SYNDROC rely on pseudo-Bayesian algorithms.
  • Challenges exist in diagnosing rare or isolated cases with traditional methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To implement and evaluate a novel
  • descriptive algorithm
  • for differential diagnosis of human malformation patterns.
  • To compare the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of the descriptive algorithm against the pseudo-Bayesian algorithm.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a descriptive algorithm that assigns equal weight to each anomaly.
  • Analysis of 100 unique syndrome cases from the University of Washington's Medical Genetics register.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of diagnostic performance across three proposed diagnosis windows for both algorithms.

    • Main Results:

    • The descriptive algorithm achieved 91% correct diagnosis rates (54% in the first window).
    • The pseudo-Bayesian algorithm achieved 92% correct diagnosis rates (55% in the first window).
    • A combined algorithm yielded a 96% correct diagnosis rate, though with more proposed diagnoses.

    Conclusions:

    • The descriptive algorithm demonstrates comparable accuracy to the pseudo-Bayesian algorithm in diagnosing malformation patterns.
    • The descriptive algorithm may offer an alternative for diagnosing rare or isolated cases.
    • Increased number of proposed diagnoses is a trade-off for the descriptive algorithm's approach.