Immunology of primary biliary cirrhosis

(1) The serological diagnosis of PBC is possible in almost 100% of cases when appropriate methods and specific antigen preparations are used such as the purified ATPase fraction by ELISA for the detection of anti-M2, sonicated mitochondria by immunodiffusion for the demonstration of precipitating antibodies against M-A or M-B, and cell cultures by immunofluorescence for the detection of antibodies against nuclear dots. (2) The establishment of AMA profiles obtained by ELISA and CFT seems to be a sensitive approach to a better definition of the natural course of PBC. A distinction between a rather benign and a more progressive course seems especially possible in the presence of the AMA profiles A and B (anti-M9 and/or anti-M2-positive only by ELISA) versus D (anti-M2-, anti-M4-, anti-M8-positive in the CFT). (3) The analysis of cellular immune reactions in vitro and in vivo suggests an activation of cytotoxic T cells as well as a defect in the function of T suppressor cells. (4) Although the aetiology of PBC is unknown, the detection of MHC Class II antigens on bile duct epithelial cells in liver biopsies of patients with PBC but not of normal individuals may imply that an infectious agent being exposed in association with these MHC structures may trigger the disease. The inability of the immune system in controlling this infectious process would then lead to an ongoing inflammatory reaction which is responsible for the continuous destruction of bile ducts within portal triads.