Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surgicel® mimicking a retained appendix on CT: a case report and literature review of diagnostic pitfalls in retained Surgicel® cases.

Journal of surgical case reports·2025
Same author

Transferring laparoscopic skills to robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review.

Journal of robotic surgery·2024
Same author

Does syncope require rhythmic and non-rhythmic evaluation in patients with previous MI?

Heart Asia·2016
Same author

Role of laparoscopic peritoneal biopsy in the diagnosis of peritoneal tuberculosis. A seven-year experience.

Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2014
Same author

Infection complications and pattern of bacterial resistance in living-donor liver transplantation: a multicenter epidemiologic study in Egypt.

Transplantation proceedings·2014
Same author

Optimizing outcome of recurrent hepatitis C virus genotype 4 after living donor liver transplantation: moving forward by looking back.

Transplantation proceedings·2014
Same journal

Technologies and management strategies for improving operational efficiency in operating theatres: A scoping review.

Journal of perioperative practice·2026
Same journal

Acquired haemophilia A diagnosed during preoperative evaluation for lung cancer surgery: A case report.

Journal of perioperative practice·2026
Same journal

The hidden myocardium: Why intraoperative hypotension should be treated as myocardial injury prevention rather than a transient anaesthetic variable.

Journal of perioperative practice·2026
Same journal

Comparative evaluation of traditional versus generative AI patient education material on prehabilitation.

Journal of perioperative practice·2026
Same journal

Patients' experiences of awake surgery under local anaesthesia: A qualitative literature review.

Journal of perioperative practice·2026
Same journal

Wound healing in orthopaedic surgery for people living with HIV: Physiologic, surgical, and social determinants of health.

Journal of perioperative practice·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
05:17

Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Published on: February 9, 2024

998

Group & save sampling in lumbar decompression: A review into current practice.

M McKenna1, A Abdelaal1

  • 197644Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK.

Journal of Perioperative Practice
|November 23, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

For elective lumbar decompression surgery, a single group and save test is sufficient, reducing unnecessary testing and costs. This approach is cost-effective and safe for patients, without impacting care quality.

Keywords:
Blood transfusionCost analysesLumbar decompressionSpinal surgerySpineTransfusion

More Related Videos

Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review
04:33

Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Published on: November 8, 2024

649
Multilevel Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease with Instability
11:30

Multilevel Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease with Instability

Published on: July 25, 2025

841

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
05:17

Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Published on: February 9, 2024

998
Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review
04:33

Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Published on: November 8, 2024

649
Multilevel Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease with Instability
11:30

Multilevel Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease with Instability

Published on: July 25, 2025

841

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Transfusion Medicine
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Postoperative blood transfusion is a consideration in surgical procedures.
  • Elective lumbar decompression patients have low transfusion risk but undergo multiple preoperative group & save tests.
  • Current practice may involve excessive preoperative blood testing for low-risk patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze postoperative blood loss and transfusion rates in lumbar decompression surgery without fusion.
  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and patient impact of single versus multiple group & save samples.
  • To determine if selective group & save testing is appropriate for this patient cohort.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of medical records for lumbar decompression surgery patients.
  • Analysis of postoperative blood loss (estimated by Hb drop) and transfusion rates.
  • Cost analysis of current versus proposed selective group & save testing protocols.

Main Results:

  • Average Hb drop was 12.3 g/dL; 14% of patients had >20 g/dL Hb loss.
  • No patients required a postoperative blood transfusion.
  • 65% of patients were suitable for single group & save sampling, estimating a potential saving of £2415.95 (53%).

Conclusions:

  • Selective group & save testing for elective lumbar decompression is cost-effective.
  • Implementing selective testing safeguards patients from unnecessary procedures.
  • Further prospective multi-center studies are warranted to validate these findings.