Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
New measures improved the reporting of heterogeneity in diagnostic test accuracy reviews: a metaepidemiological study
María Nieves Plana1, Teresa Pérez2, Javier Zamora3
1Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Príncipe de Asturias University Hospital, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain; CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health, Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Statistics Studies, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Objectives:
To describe the methods used to quantify heterogeneity and to propose alternative measures to improve reporting of heterogeneity in Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) reviews.
Study Design And Setting:
Our metaepidemiological study included all DTA reviews in the Cochrane Library up to October 6th, 2019. We summarized reviews' characteristics focusing on heterogeneity analysis. We selected reviews with a bivariate model and ≥4 studies for reanalysis. In this group, we fitted bivariate random effects models and we quantified heterogeneity by means of logit variances of sensitivity and specificity, bivariate I2, median odds ratio (OR), and the area of the 95% prediction ellipse. We provided a narrative interpretation of these measures in different scenarios.
Results:
There were 124 Cochrane DTA reviews of which 91 (73%) included meta-analysis. Only in 5 meta-analyses, variances of the logit sensitivity and specificity were reported, and in 21 meta-analyses (23%), the 95% prediction ellipse was reported without any calculation of its area. We selected 60 of these 91 reviews to explore the behavior of all measures of heterogeneity. We found that most reviews described the subjective heterogeneity as moderate or extreme (n = 31/60, 52%), whereas the area of the 95% prediction ellipse and the median OR for sensitivity and specificity showed high variability; the area ranged from 5% to 97%, the median OR of sensitivity ranged from 1.13 to 10.7, and the median OROR of specificity ranged from 1.18 to 19.68.
Conclusion:
Cochrane DTA reviews show a poor reporting of between-study heterogeneity. Using median OR and the area of the 95% prediction ellipse will improve reporting and interpretation of this crucial aspect of DTA meta-analysis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Test for Homogeneity
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

