Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Sample Preparation for Computed Tomography-based Three-dimensional Visualization of Murine Hind-limb Vessels
Published on: October 7, 2021
Comparison Between Below Knee Contrast Enhanced Tomographic 3D Ultrasound and CT, MR or Catheter Angiography for
Steven Rogers1, Joao Carreira2, Alison Phair3
1Academic Surgery Unit, Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Independent Vascular Services Ltd, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Objective:
Clear imaging of below knee and foot arteries is essential to plan distal reconstructions. Contrast enhanced tomographic 3D ultrasound (CEtUS) is novel and entirely safe with no exposure to ionising radiation or nephrotoxic contrast. In the present study, inter- and intra-observer agreement of CEtUS was calculated, and compared with below knee angiography.
Methods:
In the same week as computed tomography, magnetic resonance or catheter angiography, CEtUS was performed using intravenous 1.2 mL bolus injections of Sonovue with a maximum of 5 mL administered per patient. CEtUS was reported by a vascular scientist blinded to the angiograms reported by a consultant radiologist. Images were compared using a modified Society of Vascular Surgery (SVS) runoff score.
Results:
Of the 181 patients recruited with peripheral arterial disease, 20 were excluded from analysis as they withdrew consent, could not be cannulated, or their images were non-diagnostic. In the remaining 161 patients, there were 175 comparative patient images split into two groups: 81 had calf imaging and 94 had pedal imaging representing 405 and 198 imaged arteries, respectively. Weighted quadratic kappa/ICC values for intra- and inter-observer agreement were excellent (κ/ICC = 0.83 to 0.95) and had narrow confidence intervals in both groups. When comparing angiography and CEtUS, weighted quadratic κ/ICC agreement was moderate with acceptable confidence intervals in both groups (Calf κ/ICC = 0.54; Pedal κ/ICC = 0.53). Agreement decreased from popliteal to pedal vessels as diameter decreased. Agreement between CEtUS and digital subtraction angiography was best, and computed tomography angiography the weakest.
Conclusion:
CEtUS is a novel imaging modality with strong observer agreement that achieves clear peripheral and foot images without ionising radiation exposure or nephrotoxic X-ray contrast media. CEtUS enhances visualisation of runoff vessels, which may play a role in planning of limb salvage or targeted assessment.
More Related Videos
09:32Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging
Published on: December 9, 2021
05:26Two-Dimensional X-Ray Angiography to Examine Fine Vascular Structure Using a Silicone Rubber Injection Compound
Published on: January 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies