Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

Integrated Compensatory Responses in a Human Model of Hemorrhage
Published on: November 20, 2016
Downstream hospital system effects of a comprehensive trauma recovery services program
Belinda DeMario1, Mark J Kalina, Evelyn Truong
1From the Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Burn, and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (B.D., E.T., E.S.T., J.A.C., V.P.H.), Community Trauma Institute (B.D., M.J.K., S.H., H.V.), and Department of Orthopedic Surgery (H.V.), MetroHealth Medical Center; and Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences (V.P.H.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Background:
Trauma patients are often noted to have poor compliance but high recidivism and readmission rates. Participation in a trauma recovery services (TRS) program, which provides peer support and other psychosocial resources, may impact the trajectory of patient recovery by decreasing barriers to follow-up. We hypothesized that TRS participants would have greater downstream nonemergent use of our hospital system over the year following trauma, manifested by more positive encounters, fewer negative encounters, and lower emergency department (ED) charges.
Methods:
We studied trauma survivors (March 2017 to March 2018) offered TRS. Hospital encounters and charges 1 year from index admission were compared between patients who accepted and declined TRS. Positive encounters were defined as outpatient visits and planned admissions; negative encounters were defined as no shows, ED visits, and unplanned admissions. Charges were grouped as cumulative ED and non-ED charges (including outpatient and subsequent admission charges). Adjusted logistic and linear regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with positive/negative encounters and ED charges.
Results:
Of 511 identified patients (68% male; injury severity score, 14 [9-19]), 362 (71%) accepted TRS. Trauma recovery services patients were older, had higher injury severity, and longer index admission length of stay (all p < 0.05). After adjusting for confounders, TRS patients were more likely to have at least one positive encounter and were similarly likely to have negative encounters as patients who declined services. Total aggregate charges for this group was US $74 million, of which US $30 million occurred downstream of the index admission. Accepting TRS was associated with lower ED charges.
Conclusion:
A comprehensive TRS program including education, peer mentors, and a support network may provide value to the patient and the health care system by reducing subsequent care provided by the ED in the year after a trauma without affecting nonemergent care.
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic/care management, level IV.
Related Concept Videos
Restorative Care
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Tertiary Healthcare System
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Symptoms and Behavioral Manifestations
A spectrum of distressing symptoms characterizes PTSD. Recurrent flashbacks, where individuals involuntarily relive traumatic events,...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
