Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 29, 2025

05:17
A Reproducible Computerized Method for Quantitation of Capillary Density using Nailfold Capillaroscopy
Published on: October 27, 2015
9.2K
Comparison between low cost USB nailfold capillaroscopy and videocapillaroscopy: a pilot study
Michael Berks1, Graham Dinsdale2, Elizabeth Marjanovic2
1Centre for Imaging Sciences, Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
|November 24, 2020
Summary
Universal serial bus (USB) microscopy offers a low-cost, accessible tool for early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). This pilot study found USB capillaroscopy comparable to videocapillaroscopy in distinguishing SSc patients from controls based on capillary width.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Medical Imaging
- Dermatology
Background:
- Systemic sclerosis (SSc) diagnosis can be challenging, requiring specialized tools for microvascular assessment.
- Nailfold capillaroscopy is crucial for evaluating microvascular changes in SSc.
- Existing videocapillaroscopy methods can be costly and less accessible.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of using Universal Serial Bus (USB) microscopy for nailfold capillaroscopy.
- To compare the diagnostic performance of USB microscopy with standard videocapillaroscopy in SSc patients.
- To assess the potential of USB microscopy as a low-cost, accessible diagnostic tool.
Main Methods:
- Acquired nailfold capillaroscopy images from 20 SSc patients and 20 healthy controls using both USB microscopy and videocapillaroscopy.
- Utilized custom software for automated analysis of capillary structure, including width and density.
- Employed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (Area Under the Curve - AZ) to compare diagnostic discrimination between groups.
Main Results:
- High-quality images were generated by the USB microscope, comparable to videocapillaroscopy.
- USB microscopy achieved an AZ of 0.81 for group separation based on mean capillary width, identical to videocapillaroscopy (AZ=0.81).
- Capillary density analysis showed a lower discrimination for USB microscopy (AZ=0.48) compared to videocapillaroscopy (AZ=0.70).
Conclusions:
- USB capillaroscopy demonstrates comparable diagnostic performance to videocapillaroscopy for discriminating SSc patients from controls based on capillary width.
- The high-quality imaging and diagnostic capability highlight USB microscopy's potential as an affordable and accessible tool for clinical and research settings.
- Further research may explore optimizing USB microscopy for capillary density assessment in SSc.

