Postoperative aesthetic and healing features of postectomy using three different surgical techniques: a randomized,

Bruno Pinheiro FalcÃo1, Marcelo Marcondes Stegani1,2, SÉrgio Bernardo TenÓrio2,3

  • 1- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Cirurgia Pediátrica - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.

Insights

Different circumcision techniques yield varied healing and aesthetic outcomes in children. The Plastibell® device excelled in healing, while subcuticular stitches offered superior aesthetics, though expert opinions differed.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Dermatology
  • Plastic Surgery

Background:

  • Postectomy, or circumcision, is a common procedure in children.
  • Evaluating postoperative esthetic and healing outcomes is crucial for patient and parental satisfaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the postoperative esthetic and healing results of postectomy performed using three different surgical techniques.
  • To assess the impact of expert evaluations from dermatology, pediatrics, and plastic surgery on perceived outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, randomized clinical trial involving 149 preschool children indicated for circumcision.
  • Comparison of three techniques: Plastibell® device (PB), conventional (CV), and conventional with subcuticular stitches (SC).
  • Postoperative esthetic and healing features were scored by three specialists at 30 and 60 days.

Main Results:

  • Most patients achieved excellent healing (70%) and esthetic (56%) results.
  • The PB group showed the best healing outcomes (p=0.028), while the SC group demonstrated superior esthetics (p=0.002).
  • Expert assessments varied, with no significant differences in complications across groups.

Conclusions:

  • Surgical techniques for pediatric postectomy are perceived differently regarding healing and esthetics by various medical specialists.
  • Expert opinions on esthetic and healing parameters diverged, indicating a subjective element in outcome assessment.
  • The choice of technique may influence specific outcomes, necessitating consideration of both healing and esthetic goals.
Abstract