Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[The devil's advocate--commentary on sutures].

H Troidl1, S Büechl, J Kusche

  • 1II. Lehrstuhl für Chirurgie der Universität zu Köln.

Langenbecks Archiv Fur Chirurgie
|January 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[The impact of preoperative classification of expected intraoperative difficulties. A multicenter study].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2014
Same author

Feasibility hazards.

Surgical endoscopy·2004
Same author

[Effect of pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamics and intestinal integrity in endotoxinemia: CO2 versus helium].

Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement. Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress·2003
Same author

[Revitalizing donor livers after cardiovascular arrest with venous oxygen persufflation].

Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie. Supplement. Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress·2003
Same author

[Organization of pain therapy in surgery--comparison of acute pain service and alternative concepts].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2003
Same author

[Psoas abscesses. Genesis, diagnosis, and therapy].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2003
Same journal

[Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Case report of an 11-year-old boy].

Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie·1997
Same journal

[Local effects and changes in wound drainage in the free peritoneal cavity].

Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie·1997
Same journal

[Gasless video-endoscopic implantation of aortobifemoral vascular prostheses via extraperitoneal approach in the animal experiment].

Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie·1997
Same journal

[Procalcitonin. A new marker for acute phase reaction in acute pancreatitis].

Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie·1997
Same journal

[Myocutaneous flap as reliable defect coverage in high grade pelvic decubitus ulcers. Classification, therapeutic concept and presentation of personal patient sample of 16 years].

Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie·1997
Same journal

[Merkel cell tumor or neuroendocrine skin carcinoma].

Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie·1997
See all related articles

Surgical staplers and hand sutures show no significant difference in patient safety or cost for large bowel procedures. While staplers offer comfort and handle difficult anastomoses, hand sutures remain recommended due to potential impacts on physical function and quality of life.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical innovation
  • Gastrointestinal surgery
  • Surgical techniques

Background:

  • Comparison of surgical techniques for bowel anastomosis.
  • Hand suture versus stapler device in gastrointestinal surgery.
  • Limited retrospective data for upper GI and respiratory tracts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Evaluate patient safety and cost-effectiveness of hand suture versus stapler for large bowel anastomosis.
  • Assess the benefits and drawbacks of stapler use in complex surgical cases.
  • Determine the impact of stapler technology on patient outcomes and quality of life.

Main Methods:

  • Review of randomized trials for large bowel procedures.
  • Retrospective analysis of upper gastrointestinal and respiratory tract surgeries.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of patient security, cost, and time consumption between techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences observed in patient safety or cost-time efficiency between hand suture and stapler methods.
    • Stapler devices provide greater comfort during surgical procedures.
    • Staplers enable the creation of anatomically challenging anastomoses.

    Conclusions:

    • Hand suture technique is still recommended despite stapler advantages.
    • Potential negative impacts of stapler use on physical function (e.g., incontinence) and quality of life require further investigation.
    • Stapler use in surgery can be beneficial when applied critically.