Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 28, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Genetic feature engineering enables characterisation of shared risk factors in immune-mediated diseases
Oliver S Burren1,2, Guillermo Reales1,2, Limy Wong1,2
1Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Puddicombe Way, Cambridge, CB2 0AW, UK.
Background:
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified pervasive sharing of genetic architectures across multiple immune-mediated diseases (IMD). By learning the genetic basis of IMD risk from common diseases, this sharing can be exploited to enable analysis of less frequent IMD where, due to limited sample size, traditional GWAS techniques are challenging.
Methods:
Exploiting ideas from Bayesian genetic fine-mapping, we developed a disease-focused shrinkage approach to allow us to distill genetic risk components from GWAS summary statistics for a set of related diseases. We applied this technique to 13 larger GWAS of common IMD, deriving a reduced dimension "basis" that summarised the multidimensional components of genetic risk. We used independent datasets including the UK Biobank to assess the performance of the basis and characterise individual axes. Finally, we projected summary GWAS data for smaller IMD studies, with less than 1000 cases, to assess whether the approach was able to provide additional insights into genetic architecture of less common IMD or IMD subtypes, where cohort collection is challenging.
Results:
We identified 13 IMD genetic risk components. The projection of independent UK Biobank data demonstrated the IMD specificity and accuracy of the basis even for traits with very limited case-size (e.g. vitiligo, 150 cases). Projection of additional IMD-relevant studies allowed us to add biological interpretation to specific components, e.g. related to raised eosinophil counts in blood and serum concentration of the chemokine CXCL10 (IP-10). On application to 22 rare IMD and IMD subtypes, we were able to not only highlight subtype-discriminating axes (e.g. for juvenile idiopathic arthritis) but also suggest eight novel genetic associations.
Conclusions:
Requiring only summary-level data, our unsupervised approach allows the genetic architectures across any range of clinically related traits to be characterised in fewer dimensions. This facilitates the analysis of studies with modest sample size by matching shared axes of both genetic and biological risk across a wider disease domain, and provides an evidence base for possible therapeutic repurposing opportunities.
More Related Videos
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
09:08Investigating Target Gene Function in a CD40 Agonistic Antibody-induced Colitis Model using CRISPR/Cas9-based Technologies
Published on: June 2, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Autoimmune Disorders
Concept and Mechanism of Autoimmune Diseases
The immune...
What is Genetic Engineering?
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Gene-Environment Interactions