Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

475
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
475
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.9K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

47.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
47.9K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.5K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

38.4K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.4K
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

179
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
179

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social implications of human food subsidies on wildlife populations.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Habitat selection during dispersal reduces the energetic cost of transport when making large displacements.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Physiological synchrony among human fishers during collective hunting with wild dolphins.

Biology letters·2025
Same author

COVID-19 lockdown effects on the foraging strategies of a facultative scavenger.

Biology letters·2025
Same author

Social and spatial drivers of the multitiered structure of zebra finch social networks.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Non-breeding social behaviour as an investment in reducing future territoriality costs.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 28, 2025

Assessing Dominant-Submissive Behavior in Adult Rats Following Traumatic Brain Injury
03:56

Assessing Dominant-Submissive Behavior in Adult Rats Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: December 16, 2022

1.8K

Shared decision-making allows subordinates to lead when dominants monopolize resources.

Danai Papageorgiou1,2,3,4, Damien R Farine1,2,3,5

  • 1Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Department of Collective Behavior, Universitätsstraße 10, Konstanz 78457, Germany. dpapageorgiou@ab.mpg.de dfarine@ab.mpg.de.

Science Advances
|November 26, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Shared decision-making in vulturine guineafowl reduces intragroup conflict over food resources. When dominants monopolize food, subordinates initiate movement, influencing group direction and maintaining social balance.

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.3K
High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
06:11

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity

Published on: September 26, 2025

209

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 28, 2025

Assessing Dominant-Submissive Behavior in Adult Rats Following Traumatic Brain Injury
03:56

Assessing Dominant-Submissive Behavior in Adult Rats Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: December 16, 2022

1.8K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.3K
High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
06:11

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity

Published on: September 26, 2025

209

Area of Science:

  • Animal behavior
  • Social dynamics
  • Ecology

Background:

  • Leadership and dominance are often confused in social hierarchies.
  • Dominant individuals may monopolize resources, causing conflict.
  • Understanding group decision-making is key to social stability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of shared decision-making in mitigating intragroup conflict.
  • To examine how resource monopolization affects group movement and influence dynamics.
  • To differentiate leadership from dominance in social species.

Main Methods:

  • Studied movement initiations in wild vulturine guineafowl (Numida meleagris).
  • Observed behavior in relation to monopolizable and non-monopolizable food patches.
  • Analyzed initiation of collective movement and direction following.

Main Results:

  • Subordinates initiated collective movement when excluded from monopolizable food patches.
  • Dominant individuals followed subordinate-initiated movement away from monopolized resources.
  • Dominant individuals extensively contributed to group decisions at non-monopolizable resources.

Conclusions:

  • Shared decision-making reduces conflict in animal societies.
  • Resource competition dynamics influence the balance of influence within groups.
  • Vulturine guineafowl exhibit flexible group decision-making strategies.