Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Role of Inhibitory Control in Moderating Working Memory Training Transfer: Evidence from a Preregistered Trial with Older Adults.

Research square·2026
Same author

Handgrip strength relates to corticospinal tract microstructure in older adults.

Brain research bulletin·2026
Same author

Portable automated rapid testing for auditory assessment: repeated at-home testing in older adults.

Frontiers in digital health·2026
Same author

Remote Sensory-Cognitive Assessment in Children with Autism: Evaluating Feasibility and Performance Outcomes.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Attraction and repulsion in perception and working memory as complementary outcomes of learning.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same author

Correction: EEG-based classification of alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia using functional connectivity.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 28, 2025

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
08:26

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Published on: January 11, 2016

12.4K

N-Back Related ERPs Depend on Stimulus Type, Task Structure, Pre-processing, and Lab Factors.

Mahsa Alizadeh Shalchy1, Valentina Pergher2,3, Anja Pahor1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|November 26, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Variations in N-Back task design, stimulus type, and lab environment significantly impact working memory (WM) electroencephalogram (EEG) results. Researchers must account for these factors for consistent findings.

Keywords:
ERPsN-Backcross-laboratoryexperimental featurespre-processingworking memory

More Related Videos

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.0K
An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
05:04

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

Published on: October 4, 2018

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 28, 2025

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
08:26

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Published on: January 11, 2016

12.4K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.0K
An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
05:04

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

Published on: October 4, 2018

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychophysiology

Background:

  • The N-Back task is a standard measure of working memory (WM) updating.
  • Electroencephalogram (EEG) studies increasingly use the N-Back task to explore WM's electrophysiological correlates.
  • Inconsistencies in EEG findings may arise from variations in stimulus type, task structure, and laboratory settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how stimulus type, task structure, and laboratory environment influence N-Back task behavioral and EEG responses.
  • To assess the impact of different EEG pre-processing methods on N-Back task results.

Main Methods:

  • Nine variations of the N-Back task were created by manipulating stimulus type and task structure.
  • The effects of different pre-processing methods and laboratory environments were explored.
  • Behavioral and electrophysiological (EEG) data were collected and analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences in behavioral and EEG signatures were observed based on N-Back stimulus type and task structure.
  • EEG results were also affected by the chosen pre-processing methods.
  • Laboratory environment variations introduced notable differences in the obtained data.

Conclusions:

  • Experimental factors like stimulus type, task structure, and laboratory environment significantly influence N-Back task outcomes.
  • Analysis pipelines and laboratory differences are critical considerations often overlooked in the literature.
  • Accounting for these variables is essential for accurate interpretation and cross-study comparisons of N-Back EEG research.