Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 28, 2025

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Intrasession repeatability of corneal, limbal and scleral measurements obtained with a fourier transform profilometer
Laurent Bataille1, Ainhoa Molina-Martin1, David P Piñero2
1Group of Optics and Visual Perception. Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Spain.
Purpose:
To evaluate the intrasession repeatability of corneal, limbal and scleral measurements obtained by an experienced operator with a Fourier transform profilometer in healthy eyes.
Methods:
Prospective, single-center study including 35 eyes of 35 participants with ages ranging from 13 to 52 years. All patients underwent three consecutive corneoscleral topographic evaluations with the Eye Surface Profiler (ESP) system (Eaglet Eye b.v.). Intrasession repeatability was analyzed for different geometric and sagittal height variables using the following parameters: the within-subject standard deviation (Sw) of the three consecutive measurements, intrasubject precision (1.96 × Sw), coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results:
Inner best fit sphere (BFS) showed good repeatability, with ICC of 0.844. Higher variability was observed for the repeated measurements of limbus and outer BFS, with ICCs of 0.636 and 0.739, respectively. For mean corneal and scleral radius, ICCs were 0.933 and 0.888, respectively. The repeatability of all sagittal height data was good for all chords evaluated (11-15 mm), with Sw values from 0.02 to 0.11 mm, and ICCs from 0.568 to 0.909. A significant positive correlation was found between the magnitude of temporal-nasal sagittal height difference for all measured chords and its Sw associated.
Conclusion:
The ESP system can provide consistent measurements of sagittal height data for different chord diameters as well as for mean corneal and scleral radius in healthy eyes. Best fit approaches for limbal and scleral areas were less repeatable, although within a clinically acceptable range.
More Related Videos
06:55Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
Published on: June 6, 2017
07:51Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
Published on: October 21, 2022