The hare and the tortoise: extreme mitotic rates and how these affect live birth

Is live birth of patients with excessive slow (no blastocyst on day 5) and fast mitotic rate (full blastocyst development on day 4) comparable to a matched control standard (blastocyst formation on day 5)?

In this retrospective matched (age and anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH]) case-control study rates of fertilization, blastulation, implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth were compared in couples with male factor indication, prolonged embryo culture and fresh single morula and blastocyst transfer.

The rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth in the slow-developing group were significantly (P < 0.001) lower (17.6%, 13.7%, and 11.8%, respectively) compared with the fast (58.5%, 52.5%, 47.5%) and normal growing counterparts (51.5%, 42.6%, 39.6%). No differences in neonatal outcome could be observed between the three groups. Sex ratio in the fast-growing group was not different from the other cohorts.

Extremely slow development, as assessed by the absence of blastulation on day 5, is a negative predictor of pregnancy and live birth. In contrast, the fear that extremely fast-growing embryos may represent an aneuploid cohort of embryos is unsubstantiated. Day-4 full blastocysts can preferentially be considered for transfer.