Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 28, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Comparative effectiveness of direct admission and admission through emergency departments for children: a randomized
JoAnna K Leyenaar1,2, Corrie E McDaniel3, Stephanie C Acquilano4
1Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA. JoAnna.K.Leyenaar@hitchcock.org.
Insights
Directly admitting children to the hospital bypasses the emergency department (ED), potentially improving care timeliness and patient experience. This study compares direct admissions versus traditional ED admissions for hospitalized children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric hospital medicine
- Healthcare quality improvement
- Clinical trial methodology
Background:
- Millions of children are hospitalized annually in the U.S., with most entering through emergency departments (EDs).
- Direct admission, bypassing the ED, may enhance care quality, timeliness, and patient experience.
- Limited research exists comparing direct versus ED-initiated hospital admissions for children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of a standardized direct admission approach versus ED-initiated admission for hospitalized children.
- To evaluate the impact of direct admission on clinical care timeliness and patient experience.
- To assess secondary outcomes including ICU transfers and rapid response calls.
Main Methods:
- A stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial across 3 diverse hospitals.
- Randomization of 70 primary/urgent care sites to a direct admission program over 24 months.
- Primary outcome: timeliness of clinical care; secondary outcomes: patient experience, ICU transfers, rapid response calls.
Main Results:
- Anticipated enrollment: 190 direct admissions and 1506 ED admissions.
- Analysis will compare effectiveness using regression models with random effects and fixed effects.
- Heterogeneity of treatment effects and a mixed-methods process evaluation will be conducted.
Conclusions:
- This is the first randomized controlled trial comparing direct versus ED admission for pediatric patients.
- The study employs a robust stepped wedge design and implementation assessment.
- Valuable data will be generated on the reproducibility of direct admission benefits across healthcare systems.
Background:
Approximately 2 million children are hospitalized each year in the United States, with more than three-quarters of non-elective hospitalizations admitted through emergency departments (EDs). Direct admission, defined as admission to hospital without first receiving care in the hospital's ED, may offer benefits for patients and healthcare systems in quality, timeliness, and experience of care. While ED utilization patterns are well studied, there is a paucity of research comparing the effectiveness of direct and ED admissions. The overall aim of this project is to compare the effectiveness of a standardized direct admission approach to admission beginning in the ED for hospitalized children.
Methods/Design:
We will conduct a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial at 3 structurally and geographically diverse hospitals. A total of 70 primary and urgent care practice sites in the hospitals' catchment areas will be randomized to a time point when they will begin participation in the multi-stakeholder informed direct admission program. This crossover will be unidirectional and occur at 4 time points, 6 months apart, over a 24-month implementation period. Our primary outcome will be the timeliness of clinical care provision. Secondary outcomes include (i) parent-reported experience of care, (ii) unanticipated transfer to the intensive care unit within 6 h of hospital admission, and (iii) rapid response calls within 6 h of hospital admission. We anticipate that 190 children and adolescents will be directly admitted, with 1506 admitted through EDs. Analyses will compare the effectiveness of direct admission to admission through the ED and will evaluate the causal effect of implementing a direct admission program using linear regression with random effects for referring practice clusters and time period fixed effects. We will further examine the heterogeneity of treatment effects based on hypotheses specified a priori. In addition, we will conduct a mixed-methods process evaluation to assess reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of our direct admission intervention.
Discussion:
Our study represents the first randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of direct admission to admission through the ED for pediatric patients. Our scientific approach, pairing a stepped wedge design with a multi-level assessment of barriers to and facilitators of implementation, will generate valuable data about how positive findings can be reproduced across other healthcare systems.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04192799 . Registered on December 10, 2019).
More Related Videos
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Group Design
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children