Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

38.4K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.4K
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences01:28

Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences

139
Social behavior is a complex phenomenon that arises from the interaction between biological predispositions and environmental influences. This intricate interplay shapes how individuals think, feel, and act in various social contexts. Understanding these mechanisms requires insights from psychology, neuroscience, genetics, and evolutionary theory.Environmental Influences on Social BehaviorEnvironmental factors, including temperature, odors, and visual stimuli, play a crucial role in shaping...
139
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics01:27

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

2.7K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
2.7K
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

177
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
177
Social Psychology and Individual Behavior01:29

Social Psychology and Individual Behavior

151
Social psychology examines how group dynamics, emotions, and cultural influences shape individual actions and decision-making. These elements interact to form behavioral patterns that affect personal choices and social interactions.The Role of Group DynamicsGroups play a crucial role in shaping behavior by reinforcing norms and expectations. Individuals derive a sense of self from group membership, often aligning their behaviors with group norms to maintain social cohesion. For example, an...
151
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

7.1K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
7.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reimagining the role of teaching-focused faculty in research-intensive universities: The evolution of scholarly expectations and departmental influence.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Self-Testing and Follow-Through of Learning Strategies Supports Student Success.

CBE life sciences education·2025
Same author

The SkillsCenter: Creating scalable research opportunities for STEM students.

Cell·2024
Same author

Relationships between Prediction Accuracy, Metacognitive Reflection, and Performance in Introductory Genetics Students.

CBE life sciences education·2022
Same author

Successful Problem Solving in Genetics Varies Based on Question Content.

CBE life sciences education·2021
Same author

Demystifying the Meaning of Active Learning in Postsecondary Biology Education.

CBE life sciences education·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 28, 2025

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
10:17

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.4K

Student Behaviors and Interactions Influence Group Discussions in an Introductory Biology Lab Setting.

Alex R Paine1, Jennifer K Knight1

  • 1Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0347.

CBE Life Sciences Education
|December 1, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Students in biology labs often analyze data and adopt specific roles but rarely collaborate to explain reasoning. This research highlights a gap in full collaboration during group work, focusing on data analysis over shared understanding.

More Related Videos

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.0K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 28, 2025

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
10:17

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.4K
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.0K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Educational Psychology
  • Biology Education
  • Collaborative Learning

Background:

  • Traditional group work research emphasizes interventions for performance enhancement.
  • Recent calls advocate for descriptive analyses of natural group interactions in educational settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To descriptively analyze student interactions during group work in a biology laboratory course.
  • To characterize how group dynamics influence the quality and depth of student discussions.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of recorded discussions from 30 student groups (91 participants).
  • Coding of 15 unique behavioral codes to categorize student dialogue.
  • Classification of students into 10 distinct roles based on their most frequent behaviors.

Main Results:

  • The most frequent student behaviors were analyzing data, recalling information, and repeating ideas.
  • Students frequently exchanged information but rarely collaborated to exchange reasoning for conclusions.
  • Students tended to adopt specific roles within their group discussions.

Conclusions:

  • Group work in this biology lab context shows a tendency for students to focus on data analysis and role adoption.
  • Meaningful collaboration, particularly in exchanging reasoning, is less common than information exchange.
  • Findings suggest a need to foster deeper collaborative reasoning skills in student group work.