Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Incorporating stakeholders' preferences into a multi-criteria framework for planning large-scale Nature-Based
Laddaporn Ruangpan1,2, Zoran Vojinovic3,4,5,6, Jasna Plavšić4
1Department of Water Resources and Ecosystems, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611 AX, Delft, The Netherlands. l.ruangpan@un-ihe.org.
Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs) offer a flexible response to hydro-meteorological risks. Incorporating stakeholder preferences into decision-making tools enhances NBSs planning and implementation for sustainable risk mitigation.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Risk Management
- Water Resource Management
Background:
- Hydro-meteorological risks pose significant threats globally to societies, economies, and environments.
- Existing approaches to risk management require a paradigm shift towards more sustainable and flexible strategies.
- Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs) present a promising avenue for addressing these risks while promoting biodiversity and human well-being.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel methodology for selecting risk mitigation measures by integrating stakeholder preferences.
- To develop a tool that supports decision-making in the planning and implementation of Nature-Based Solutions.
- To enhance the transparency and systematic nature of NBSs planning processes.
Main Methods:
- Development of a multi-criteria analysis framework incorporating stakeholder preferences.
- Application of the methodology in case studies within the Tamnava river basin (Serbia) and Nangang river basin (Taiwan).
- Utilizing the EC-funded RECONECT project framework for practical implementation and validation.
Main Results:
- The methodology effectively incorporates diverse stakeholder preferences into risk mitigation strategy selection.
- Early and consistent stakeholder involvement is crucial for the successful implementation of Nature-Based Solutions.
- The developed tool facilitates the identification of desirable benefits and co-benefits associated with NBSs.
Conclusions:
- The proposed methodology provides a systematic and transparent approach to planning Nature-Based Solutions for hydro-meteorological risks.
- Integrating stakeholder preferences is key to achieving effective and widely accepted risk mitigation strategies.
- This approach can significantly improve the adoption and success of Nature-Based Solutions in diverse geographical contexts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Biodiversity and Human Values
Design Example: Sustainability in Concrete Building
There are multiple approaches to achieve sustainability in a commercial concrete building. For instance, construct a concrete parking area under the building, utilizing pervious concrete paver blocks in open areas to facilitate rainwater collection through an underground...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Sustainable Development

