Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 27, 2025

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.7K
Robust Consensus of Networked Evolutionary Games with Attackers and Forbidden Profiles †
Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 3, 2020
Summary
This study presents a method for achieving robust consensus in networked evolutionary games (NEGs) despite attackers and forbidden profiles. The research offers a constructive control design for reliable NEGs.
Area of Science:
- Control Theory
- Networked Systems
- Game Theory
Background:
- Networked evolutionary games (NEGs) are crucial for modeling strategic interactions in distributed systems.
- Ensuring robust consensus under adversarial conditions and constraints is a significant challenge in NEGs.
- Existing methods may not adequately address the combined complexities of attackers and forbidden profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a framework for analyzing and controlling robust consensus in NEGs with attackers and forbidden profiles.
- To establish conditions for robust constrained reachability in such systems.
- To design effective state feedback controls for achieving robust consensus.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing an algebraic state space representation to model NEGs with attackers and forbidden profiles.
- Deriving a necessary and sufficient condition for robust constrained reachability.
- Constructing robust reachable sets and proposing a constructive control design procedure.
Main Results:
- An algebraic form for NEGs with attackers and forbidden profiles was established.
- A necessary and sufficient condition for robust constrained reachability was presented.
- A constructive procedure for designing state feedback controls for robust consensus was proposed.
Conclusions:
- The proposed method effectively addresses robust consensus in NEGs with attackers and forbidden profiles.
- The derived conditions and control design are validated through an illustrative example.
- This work contributes to the reliable design of networked evolutionary game systems.
Related Concept Videos
Limits to Natural Selection
33.5K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
33.5K
Robbers Cave
14.6K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.6K
Group Polarization
37.9K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
37.9K
Predator-Prey Interactions
20.3K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
20.3K
Protein Networks
4.3K
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.3K
Protein Networks
2.6K
2.6K

