Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

How Data are Classified: Categorical Data01:11

How Data are Classified: Categorical Data

39.9K
A variable, usually notated by capital letters such as X and Y, is a characteristic or measurement that can be determined for each member of a population. Data are the actual values of variables. They may be numbers, or they may be words. Datum is a single value.
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
39.9K
Classification of Systems-II01:31

Classification of Systems-II

385
Continuous-time systems have continuous input and output signals, with time measured continuously. These systems are generally defined by differential or algebraic equations. For instance, in an RC circuit, the relationship between input and output voltage is expressed through a differential equation derived from Ohm's law and the capacitor relation,
385
Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

455
Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
455
How Data are Classified: Numerical Data00:59

How Data are Classified: Numerical Data

35.0K
Data that are countable or measurable in specific units are called numerical or quantitative data. Quantitative data are always numbers. Quantitative data are the result of counting or measuring the attributes of a population. Amount of money, pulse rate, weight, number of people living in a town, and number of students who opt for statistics are examples of quantitative data.
Quantitative data may be either discrete or continuous. All quantitative data that take on only specific numerical...
35.0K
Aggregates Classification01:29

Aggregates Classification

572
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
572
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.2K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Donor- and unit-specific factors influencing hemolysis in stored canine and feline packed red blood cells.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2026
Same author

Roadmapping stroke healthcare in Colombia: a comprehensive telestroke network evaluation.

BMC medical informatics and decision making·2026
Same author

PARP2 deficiency impairs pancreatic cancer progression by promoting genomic instability and antitumor immunity.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Increasing Kidney Transplant Volume With Higher Kidney Donor Risk Index Kidneys: A Call for Action in the United States.

Transplantation·2026
Same author

Outcomes of Kidney Transplants From Donors With Stage 3 Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Dialysis: A National Cohort Study.

Clinical transplantation·2026
Same author

Exploring metabolomic clues in diabetic retinopathy: a pilot study.

Acta diabetologica·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.8K

Multi-Objective Evolutionary Rule-Based Classification with Categorical Data.

Fernando Jiménez1, Carlos Martínez1, Luis Miralles-Pechuán2

  • 1Department of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Murcia, 30071 Murcia, Spain.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 3, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method for creating interpretable rule-based classification models from categorical data. The approach optimizes model performance and simplicity, generating accurate and understandable classifiers.

Keywords:
categorical datainterpretable machine learningmulti-objective evolutionary algorithmsrule-based classifiers

More Related Videos

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.1K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.8K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.1K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Data Mining
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Model interpretability is crucial for validation and ethical evaluation.
  • Existing methods may produce complex classifiers that are difficult to understand.
  • Categorical data classification requires interpretable models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel method for generating easily interpretable rule-based classifiers from categorical data.
  • To optimize both classifier performance and rule set size.
  • To enhance the ethical and legal evaluation of classification models.

Main Methods:

  • A multi-objective optimization approach was employed.
  • Two objectives were prioritized: maximizing classifier performance and minimizing the number of rules.
  • Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (ENORA and NSGA-II) were adapted to optimize performance using accuracy, ROC AUC, and RMSE metrics.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method generated highly accurate and interpretable classification models.
  • Extensive comparisons with classical methods (PART, JRip, OneR, ZeroR) were performed.
  • Experiments utilized multiple validation modes (full training, 10-fold cross-validation, train/test split) on public datasets.

Conclusions:

  • The novel method successfully generates classification models that are both highly accurate and easy to interpret.
  • The approach offers a valuable tool for tasks requiring transparent and understandable predictive models.
  • The findings support the use of multi-objective optimization for creating interpretable machine learning classifiers.