Comparative Transcriptomics Analyses in Livers of Mice, Humans, and Humanized Mice Define Human-Specific Gene...

Mouse is the most widely used animal model in biomedical research, but it remains unknown what causes the large number of differentially regulated genes between human and mouse livers identified in recent years. In this report, we aim to determine whether these divergent gene regulations are primarily caused by environmental factors or some of them are the result of cell-autonomous differences in gene regulation in human and mouse liver cells. The latter scenario would suggest that many human genes are subject to human-specific regulation and can only be adequately studied in a human or humanized system. To understand the similarity and divergence of gene regulation between human and mouse livers, we performed stepwise comparative analyses in human, mouse, and humanized livers with increased stringency to gradually remove the impact of factors external to liver cells, and used bioinformatics approaches to retrieve gene networks to ascertain the regulated biological processes. We first compared liver gene regulation by fatty liver disease in human and mouse under the condition where the impact of genetic and gender biases was minimized, and identified over 50% of all commonly regulated genes, that exhibit opposite regulation by fatty liver disease in human and mouse. We subsequently performed more stringent comparisons when a single specific transcriptional or post-transcriptional event was modulated in vitro or vivo or in liver-specific humanized mice in which human and mouse hepatocytes colocalize and share a common circulation. Intriguingly and strikingly, the pattern of a high percentage of oppositely regulated genes persists under well-matched conditions, even in the liver of the humanized mouse model, which represents the most closely matched in vivo condition for human and mouse liver cells that is experimentally achievable. Gene network analyses further corroborated the results of oppositely regulated genes and revealed substantial differences in regulated biological processes in human and mouse cells. We also identified a list of regulated lncRNAs that exhibit very limited conservation and could contribute to these differential gene regulations. Our data support that cell-autonomous differences in gene regulation might contribute substantially to the divergent gene regulation between human and mouse livers and there are a significant number of biological processes that are subject to human-specific regulation and need to be carefully considered in the process of mouse to human translation.