Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.5K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.5K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.3K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.1K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.1K
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

30.2K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
30.2K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

8.8K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
8.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures03:34

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

78.1K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
78.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complex Pignistic Transformation-Based Evidential Distance for Multisource Information Fusion of Medical Diagnosis in the IoT.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Bayesian Update with Information Quality under the Framework of Evidence Theory.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

An Intuitionistic Evidential Method for Weight Determination in FMEA Based on Belief Entropy.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

An Improved Multi-Source Data Fusion Method Based on the Belief Entropy and Divergence Measure.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

Time Series Data Fusion Based on Evidence Theory and OWA Operator.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2019
Same author

An Adaptive Parallel Processing Strategy for Complex Event Processing Systems over Data Streams in Wireless Sensor Networks.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.5K

Negation of Belief Function Based on the Total Uncertainty Measure.

Kangyang Xie1, Fuyuan Xiao1

  • 1School of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, No. 2 Tiansheng Road, BeiBei District, Chongqing 400715, China.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 3, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel negation method for basic probability assignment (BPA), addressing open issues in information representation. The new method reassigns BPA based on total uncertainty, offering a more robust approach than traditional probability negation.

Keywords:
Dempster-Shafer theorybasic probability assignmentnegationtotal uncertainty measure

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.5K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Information Theory
  • Decision Making
  • Mathematical Foundations

Background:

  • The negation of probability offers novel information representation methods.
  • Negating basic probability assignment (BPA) remains an unresolved challenge in the field.
  • Existing methods for negating probability distributions do not directly apply to BPAs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel method for negating basic probability assignments (BPAs).
  • To develop a negation technique for BPAs grounded in the concept of total uncertainty.
  • To provide a mathematically sound method for BPA negation that accounts for non-singleton elements.

Main Methods:

  • A new negation method for basic probability assignment (BPA) is proposed.
  • The method is based on a total uncertainty measure.
  • It considers the uncertainty of non-singleton elements within the power set.
  • BPA reassignment is weighted by the cardinality of the intersection between elements.

Main Results:

  • The proposed negation method for BPA is mathematically proven to be based on maximum uncertainty.
  • This novel BPA negation method reduces to the negation of a probability distribution when the BPA simplifies to classical probability.
  • The method effectively handles the negation of uncertain information within the BPA framework.

Conclusions:

  • The developed negation method provides a robust solution for negating basic probability assignments.
  • This approach enhances information representation by addressing the negation of uncertain information.
  • The method's mathematical foundation in maximum uncertainty ensures its validity and applicability.