Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.5K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.5K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.1K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.1K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.1K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.7K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.7K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

10.3K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
10.3K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

6.5K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
6.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Engineering Asymmetric Cu<sup>0</sup>/Cu<sup>+</sup> Interfaces for Record-Efficiency Ammonia Electrosynthesis From Dilute Nitrate in Neutral Media.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2026
Same author

Potentiated remediation of imazethapyr-contaminated soil by phosphate-doped biochar immobilized with Bacillus cereus MZ-1.

Bioresource technology·2026
Same author

Zoology, traditional uses, processing technology, chemical compositions and pharmacological activities of Hirudo: A reviews.

Journal of ethnopharmacology·2026
Same author

Glutathione depletion under hypoxia via a birnessite-type manganese oxide nanozyme inducing immunogenic ferroptosis for magnetic resonance imaging guided cancer therapy.

Theranostics·2026
Same author

Wavelength-encoded multi-wavevector excitation for filling the spatial frequency gap in label-free plasmonic super-resolution imaging.

Optics letters·2026
Same author

Flow-assembled Janus catalyst arrays for low-energy-barrier cascade dechlorination and mineralization of chlorinated organic compounds in water.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Research on a Regional Availability Evaluation Model for Road-Area High-Entropy Energy Based on Synergy Factors.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Atmospheric Turbulence Channel Modeling and Performance Analysis of a CO-ZP-OFDM Coherent Optical Communication System for UAV Air-to-Ground Scenarios.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Information Geometry and Asymptotic Theory for SMML Estimators.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Correlation Entropy and Power-Law Kinetics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Research on the Contagion of Systemic Financial Risk Under the Impact of Climate Risks-From the Perspective of Complex Networks and Machine Learning.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Statistical-Mechanical Meaning of the Wave Function of Quantum Mechanics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.2K

Kernel Risk-Sensitive Mean p-Power Error Algorithms for Robust Learning.

Tao Zhang1,2, Shiyuan Wang1,2, Haonan Zhang1,2

  • 1College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 3, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces the kernel risk-sensitive mean p-power error (KRP), a novel nonlinear similarity measure for robust learning. KRP enhances existing methods by offering improved performance in kernel adaptive filters.

Keywords:
correntropickernel adaptive filterskernel risk-sensitive mean p-power errorquantizedrecursive

More Related Videos

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.2K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.2K
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.2K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Signal Processing
  • Machine Learning
  • Robust Learning

Background:

  • Correntropic loss (C-Loss) is a nonlinear similarity measure in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS) used in robust learning.
  • The non-convex nature of C-Loss can degrade performance.
  • Kernel risk-sensitive loss (KRL) offers a convex alternative for similarity measurement in RKHS.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel nonlinear similarity measure, kernel risk-sensitive mean p-power error (KRP), as a generalization of KRL.
  • To develop robust recursive kernel adaptive filters based on the KRP criterion.
  • To enhance the robustness and reduce the network size of kernel recursive least squares algorithms (KRLS).

Main Methods:

  • Introduced the kernel risk-sensitive mean p-power error (KRP) by integrating mean p-power error into KRL.
  • Proposed two robust recursive kernel adaptive filters: recursive minimum kernel risk-sensitive mean p-power error algorithm (RMKRP) and its quantized version (QRMKRP).
  • Utilized Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithms.

Main Results:

  • The proposed KRP measure generalizes KRL and can outperform it with appropriate parameter selection.
  • The RMKRP and QRMKRP algorithms demonstrate superior robustness and reduced network size compared to existing methods.
  • Simulation results validate the effectiveness of the proposed RMKRP and QRMKRP.

Conclusions:

  • The novel KRP measure provides a flexible and effective approach for similarity measurement in RKHS.
  • The RMKRP and QRMKRP algorithms represent significant advancements in robust kernel adaptive filtering.
  • The proposed methods offer practical benefits for applications requiring robust signal processing and learning.