Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 27, 2025

12:22
Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy oSLO and Optical Coherence Tomography OCT
Published on: August 4, 2018
8.8K
Ocular surface analysis: A comparison between the LipiView® II and IDRA®
Jeong Min Lee1, Young Joon Jeon1, Kook Young Kim1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
European Journal of Ophthalmology
|December 3, 2020
Summary
The LipiView II and IDRA ocular surface analyzers show no significant difference in lipid layer thickness. However, they differ in evaluating meibomian gland dropout and blinking patterns, meaning they should not be used interchangeably.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Ocular Surface Disease
Background:
- Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a common cause of evaporative dry eye.
- Accurate assessment of meibomian gland dropout and blinking patterns is crucial for MGD diagnosis and management.
- Ocular surface analyzers like LipiView II (LVII) and IDRA provide quantitative data on the ocular surface.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the lipid layer thickness (LLT), meibomian gland (MG) dropout rates, and partial blink rates (PBR) between the LipiView II (LVII) and IDRA ocular surface analyzers.
- To determine if these devices can be used interchangeably for ocular surface assessments.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional observational study involving 47 participants.
- Lipid layer thickness, MG dropout percentages, and PBR were measured from both eyes using LVII and IDRA.
- Image acquisition of the inferior eyelid was performed in a random order for both devices.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was found in LLT between LVII and IDRA.
- A significant difference was observed in MG dropout percentages (LVII: 36.51% ± 17.53; IDRA: 45.36% ± 21.87; p=0.003).
- Significant differences were also found in PBR (LVII: 0.51 ± 0.37; IDRA: 0.23 ± 0.27; p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- LVII and IDRA demonstrate comparable measurements for LLT.
- Significant discrepancies exist between LVII and IDRA for MG dropout and PBR assessments.
- These devices should not be used interchangeably for evaluating MG dropout and PBR in clinical practice.
Keywords:
Diseases of the ocular surfaceTear deficiency stateseyelid diseaselid inflammation affecting the ocular surface
