Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
The Cost of Implementing and Sustaining the COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services Model
William S Bayliss1, Cheryl D Bushnell2, Jacqueline R Halladay3
1Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
The COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) model costs vary by hospital. Higher stroke patient volume and enrollment reduce costs per patient, potentially lowering net costs by preventing readmissions.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare economics
- Transitional care interventions
- Stroke rehabilitation
Background:
- The COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) model is a transitional care intervention for stroke patients.
- It was evaluated against standard care in a cluster-randomized trial across 40 North Carolina hospitals.
- This study specifically analyzed the hospital-level costs of implementing and sustaining the COMPASS model.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the hospital-level costs associated with implementing and sustaining the COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) model.
- To identify factors influencing these costs, such as patient volume and enrollment numbers.
- To assess the potential cost-effectiveness of the COMPASS model in reducing overall healthcare expenditures for stroke survivors.
Main Methods:
- An activity-based costing survey was used to estimate hospital-level resource costs for COMPASS-related activities over approximately one year.
- Data were collected from 22 hospitals actively engaged in COMPASS.
- Hospital-level costs per COMPASS enrollee were estimated using median wage data and COMPASS enrollment figures.
Main Results:
- Between November 2017 and March 2019, 1582 patients received the COMPASS intervention across 22 hospitals.
- Average annual hospital-level COMPASS costs were $2861 per patient.
- Increased stroke patient volume (10% higher) correlated with a 5.1% decrease in COMPASS costs per patient (P=0.016).
- Postacute clinic visits and case ascertainment were the highest cost activities for many hospitals.
Conclusions:
- The costs of implementing the COMPASS model demonstrated variability across hospitals.
- Hospitals with higher stroke volumes and enrollment reported lower per-patient costs.
- The COMPASS model has the potential to reduce net costs if it can prevent approximately 6 stroke readmissions annually.
More Related Videos
04:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes
Published on: September 6, 2024
07:35Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Restorative Care