Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Short-term and long-term outcomes of revascularization interventions for patients with severely reduced left
Junyu Pei1, Xiaopu Wang1, Zhenhua Xing1,2
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) offers lower long-term mortality for patients with reduced ejection fraction compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, CABG is linked to an increased risk of stroke, particularly long-term.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Severely reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction poses significant risks for patients with coronary artery disease.
- Choosing between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is critical for this patient group.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of CABG versus PCI in patients with severely reduced LV ejection fraction.
- To evaluate long-term mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and repeat revascularization rates for both procedures.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of 18 studies involving 11,686 patients.
- Searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 1, 2020.
- Primary endpoints: 30-day and long-term mortality. Secondary endpoints: MI, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and repeat revascularization.
Main Results:
- CABG demonstrated lower long-term mortality, cardiovascular mortality, MI, and repeat revascularization compared to PCI.
- No significant difference in 30-day mortality or long-term stroke risk was observed initially.
- However, CABG was associated with a higher risk of 30-day stroke and, in subgroup analysis, a higher long-term stroke risk.
Conclusions:
- For patients with severely reduced LV ejection fraction, CABG leads to reduced mortality rates.
- The benefit of CABG in terms of mortality must be weighed against its associated increased risk of stroke.
Aims:
This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should be preferred in patients with severely reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction.
Methods And Results:
We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from the conception of the databases till 1 May 2020 for studies on patients with severely reduced LV ejection fraction undergoing CABG and PCI. The primary clinical endpoints were 30 day and long-term mortalities. The secondary endpoints were 30 day and long-term incidences of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke, long-term cardiovascular mortality, and repeat revascularization. Eighteen studies involving 11 686 patients were analysed. Compared with PCI, CABG had lower long-term mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.80, P < 0.01], cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43-0.85, P < 0.01), MI (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36-0.72, P < 0.01), and repeat revascularization (HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.23-0.47, P < 0.01) risk. Significant differences were not observed for long-term stroke (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.74-1.87, P = 0.49), 30 day mortality (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.89-1.56, P = 0.25), and MI (HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.16-1.11, P = 0.08) risk. CABG was associated with a higher risk of stroke within 30 days (HR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.07-7.77, P = 0.04). In a subgroup analysis of propensity score-matched studies, CABG was associated with a higher long-term risk of stroke (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.20-2.16, P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
Among patients with severely reduced LV ejection fraction, CABG resulted in a lower mortality rate and an increased risk of stroke.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

