Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Two year outcome in nonagenarians undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair
Aikaterini Christidi1, Jafer Haschemi1, Maximilian Spieker1
1Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Aims:
Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) has emerged as standard treatment in selected patients with clinically relevant mitral regurgitation (MR) and increased surgical risk. We aimed to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes in nonagenarians undergoing PMVR.
Methods And Results:
Altogether, 493 patients with severe MR who were treated with PMVR were included in this open-label prospective study and followed up for 2 years. We treated 25 patients with PMVR aged 90 years or above, 185 patients aged 80-89 years, and 283 patients aged <80 years. PMVR in nonagenarians was safe and did not differ from PMVR in younger patients in terms of safety endpoints. Device success did not differ among the groups (100% in nonagenarians, 95.7% in octogenarians, and 95.1% in septuagenarians, P = 0.100). Unadjusted 2 year mortality was 28% in nonagenarians, 32.4% in octogenarians, and 19.8% in septuagenarians (P = 0.008). Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed similar 2 year survival in the nonagenarian and octogenarian groups (P = 0.657). In the multivariate analysis, age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.031, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.002-1.060, P = 0.034], higher post-procedural transmitral valve gradients (HR 1.187, 95% CI 1.104-1.277, P = 0.001), and post-procedural acute kidney injury (HR 2.360, 95% CI 1.431-3.893, P = 0.001) were independent predictors of 2 year mortality. Altogether, 89.4% of the nonagenarians, 85.9% of the octogenarians, and 86.4% of the septuagenarians had MR grade of 2+ or less at 1 year after PMVR (P = 0.910). New York Heart Association functional class improved in the vast majority of patients, irrespective of age (P = 0.129). After 1 year, 9.5% of the nonagenarians, 22.3% of the octogenarians, and 25.2% of the septuagenarians (each P = 0.001 compared with baseline) suffered from New York Heart Association Functional Class III or IV. The rate of heart failure rehospitalization in the first 12 months after PMVR did not differ among the groups (16% in the nonagenarians, 16.7% in the octogenarians, and 17.7% in the septuagenarians) (P = 0.954). Quality of life assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire before and at 1 year after PMVR improved in all age groups (P = 0.001).
Conclusions:
Percutaneous mitral valve repair in carefully selected nonagenarians is feasible and safe with intermediate-term beneficial effects comparable with those in younger patients.
Insights
Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) is safe and effective for nonagenarians with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Outcomes are comparable to younger patients, showing improved quality of life and functional class.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Geriatric Medicine
Background:
- Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) is an established treatment for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in high-risk patients.
- Evaluating PMVR safety and efficacy in nonagenarians (≥90 years) is crucial due to their increased surgical risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and clinical outcomes of PMVR in nonagenarians.
- To compare outcomes in nonagenarians with those in younger patient groups (80-89 and <80 years).
Main Methods:
- An open-label prospective study included 493 patients with severe MR undergoing PMVR.
- Patients were categorized into three age groups: nonagenarians (n=25), octogenarians (n=185), and septuagenarians (n=283).
- Follow-up was conducted for 2 years, assessing safety endpoints, device success, mortality, functional class, rehospitalization, and quality of life.
Main Results:
- PMVR in nonagenarians was safe, with no significant difference in safety endpoints compared to younger groups.
- Device success rates were high across all age groups (100% in nonagenarians).
- Two-year mortality was 28% in nonagenarians, comparable to octogenarians (32.4%) but higher than septuagenarians (19.8%).
- Significant improvements in New York Heart Association functional class and quality of life were observed in all age groups post-PMVR.
- One-year MR grade of 2+ or less was achieved in over 85% of patients across all age groups.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous mitral valve repair is feasible and safe in carefully selected nonagenarians.
- Intermediate-term benefits, including improved functional status and quality of life, are comparable to younger patients.
- Age, elevated transmitral valve gradients, and acute kidney injury are independent predictors of mortality post-PMVR.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction

