Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 27, 2025

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Outcome of Patients With Esophageal Atresia and Very Low Birth Weight (≤ 1,500 g)
Laura Antonia Ritz1, Anke Widenmann-Grolig2, Stefan Jechalke2
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Insights
For infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) esophageal atresia (EA), staged repair may reduce complications like recurrent fistula (RF) and anastomotic insufficiency (AI). However, staged repair was linked to higher rates of gastroesophageal reflux and longer ventilation times.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Neonatal Care
- Congenital Abnormalities
Background:
- Esophageal atresia (EA) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants presents high complication rates with primary repair.
- A staged surgical approach may offer a less traumatic alternative for preterm infants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate complication rates associated with primary versus staged repair in VLBW/extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants with EA.
- To determine if a staged repair approach is beneficial for this vulnerable patient population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of VLBW EA patients from the KEKS e.V. database.
- Pseudonymized questionnaires sent to families to collect data on surgical outcomes and complications.
Main Results:
- Forty-eight VLBW EA patients analyzed; 52% underwent primary repair.
- Higher rates of recurrent fistula (RF) after primary repair (28% vs 4%, p=0.04).
- Increased gastroesophageal reflux (GER) with staged repair (78% vs 52%, p=0.04); intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) potentially lower with staged repair in ELBW infants.
Conclusions:
- Complication rates in VLBW EA patients exceed averages, suggesting staged repair as a viable option.
- Staged repair may reduce RF and AI, but increases GER and ventilation time.
- Individualized surgical approach is crucial for VLBW/ELBW EA patients.
Abstract:
Introduction: Primary repair of esophageal atresia (EA) in infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) has been widely performed in pediatric surgery. However, several studies have shown that complication rates in infants with VLBW are high. We hypothesize preterm children benefit from a shorter, less-traumatizing operation in the first days of life, as staged repair implies. Methods: Patients with EA and VLBW were retrieved from the database of a large national patient organization KEKS e.V. Structured questionnaires were sent to all the patients' families; the responses were pseudonymized and sent to our institution. Results: Forty-eight questionnaires from patients were analyzed. The mean birth weight was 1,223 g (720-1,500 g). Primary repair was performed in 25 patients (52%). Anastomotic insufficiency (AI) was reported in 9 patients (19%), recurrent fistula (RF) in 8 (17%), and anastomotic stenosis in 24 patients (50%). Although AI was almost twice as common after primary repair than after staged repair (24 vs. 13%; p = 0.5), the difference was not statistically significant. RF was more frequent after primary repair (28 vs. 4%; p = 0.04), gastroesophageal reflux was more frequent in the group after staged repair (78 vs. 52%; p = 0.04), and both correlations were statistically significant. Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) was reported in 11 patients (23%) and was observed in 7 of them (64%, p = 0.4) after primary repair. ICH was reported in 60% of patients with ELBW and 75% of patients when ELBW was paired with primary repair. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the complication rate in patients with VLBW is higher than the average of that in patients with EA. The study indicates that a staged approach may be an option in this specific patient group, as less RF and AI are seen after staged repair. ICH rate in patients with ELBW seemed to be especially lower after staged repair. Interestingly, gastroesophageal reflux was statistically significantly higher in the group after staged repair, and postoperative ventilation time was longer. It is therefore necessary to individually consider which surgical approach is appropriate for this special patient group.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....

