Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 27, 2025

08:05
A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
Published on: March 23, 2022
2.8K
Punishment and its putative fallout: A reappraisal
Rafaela M Fontes1, Timothy A Shahan1
1Utah State University.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|December 7, 2020
Summary
This study examines Murray Sidman's concerns about punishment in behavioral control. While his arguments are valid, current data suggests potential negative side effects of punishment are not always widespread or long-lasting.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Behavioral Science
- Applied Behavior Analysis
Background:
- Murray Sidman's "Coercion and Its Fallout" critically examined punishment.
- Sidman raised concerns about punishment's effectiveness and side effects, including temporary suppression, conditioned punishment, escape/avoidance, aggression, and countercontrol.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate Sidman's arguments on punishment's shortcomings and side effects.
- To assess the empirical support for the ubiquity and severity of these negative consequences.
- To identify needs for future research and theoretical development in the study of punishment.
Main Methods:
- Review and analysis of existing empirical data on punishment.
- Examination of the evidence supporting or refuting Sidman's claims.
- Literature synthesis to identify gaps in current understanding.
Main Results:
- Empirical data does not consistently support the claim that punishment's negative side effects are always ubiquitous, long-lasting, or exclusive to punishment.
- Sidman's concerns, while valid, may not be universally applicable in all contexts.
- Further research is needed to fully understand the conditions under which these effects occur.
Conclusions:
- The purported negative side effects of punishment may not be as inherent or widespread as previously suggested.
- There is a need for more robust empirical research on punishment and its consequences.
- Development of more comprehensive theories of punishment is required to predict its effects and side effects accurately.
Related Concept Videos
Punishment
603
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
603
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
250
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
250
The Stanford Prison Experiment
24.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
24.2K
Behavior Modification
408
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
408
Operant Conditioning
2.3K
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
2.3K
Law of Effect
2.1K
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
2.1K

