Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proton RBE for in vivo model systems: LET and dose dependencies for early and late biological endpoints.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2026
Same author

PARP7 inhibitors enhance the immunogenic effects of radiation in pancreatic cancer cells.

Molecular therapy. Oncology·2026
Same author

Calculating biological dose distributions in hadrontherapy using GATE: the BioDose actor.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Water calorimetry-based beam quality correction factors for carbon and helium ion beams.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Deep learning for dose-averaged linear energy transfer estimation in pencil-beam scanning and double scattering proton radiotherapy plans with uncertainty-aware external validation.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Six-month evaluation of normal mouse brain side effects: Comparing FLASH and conventional proton partial brain irradiation.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.7K

Computer-assisted beam modeling for particle therapy.

Hermann Fuchs1, Alessio Elia2, Andreas F Resch1

  • 1Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.

Medical Physics
|December 7, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new automated method simplifies Monte Carlo (MC) beam model generation for proton and carbon ion therapy. This approach reduces user dependency and ensures accurate beam modeling for improved treatment planning.

Keywords:
Monte Carlobeam modelingcarbon ionsoptimizationparticle therapyproton therapy

More Related Videos

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

3.0K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

16.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.7K
Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

3.0K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

16.0K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Computational Physics

Background:

  • Accurate Monte Carlo (MC) beam models are crucial for precise proton and carbon ion therapy planning.
  • Current methods for generating these models can be user-dependent and time-consuming.
  • A need exists for a more automated and straightforward approach to MC beam model generation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computer-driven, less user-dependent method for generating MC beam models of scanned proton and carbon ion beam delivery systems.
  • To enable simple and straightforward generation of these complex models.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental measurements of proton and carbon ion beam properties (depth dose, spot size) were performed.
  • An automated regularization-based optimization process (AUTO-BEAM) in GATE/Geant4 was used to tune beam parameters (energy, energy spread, beam sigma, divergence, emittance).
  • The method was validated against independent measurements and applied to multiple beam lines across three particle therapy centers.

Main Results:

  • MC beam models achieved excellent agreement with measurements: particle beam ranges within 0.2 mm and spot sizes within 0.4%.
  • Dose calculations showed agreement within 1.7% for a representative clinical proton case.
  • Beam model generation for protons was completed within three working days, demonstrating efficiency.

Conclusions:

  • The developed method is independent of beam optics, particle type, and geometry, proving its versatility.
  • The approach is suitable for non-expert users with minimal interaction required.
  • Validated beam models for different systems showed good agreement, confirming the method's reliability.