Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

47.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
47.9K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

37.8K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
37.8K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

131
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
131
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

92
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
92
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.5K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

36.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
36.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ratio-Dependent Contrarian Activation in Opinion Dynamics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Two-Stroke Pumping Technique for Many-Body Systems.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Democratic Thwarting of Majority Rule in Opinion Dynamics: 1. Unavowed Prejudices Versus Contrarians.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

A Novel Evaluation of Income Class Boundaries Using Inflection Points of Probability Density Functions: A Case Study of Brazil.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Measuring the Subjective Passage of Time: A Sociophysics Modeling.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Contrarian Majority Rule Model with External Oscillating Propaganda and Individual Inertias.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion
08:19

Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion

Published on: January 15, 2016

9.1K

Asymmetric Contrarians in Opinion Dynamics.

Serge Galam1, Taksu Cheon2

  • 1CEVIPOF-Centre for Political Research, Sciences Po and CNRS, 98 rue de l'Université, 75007 Paris, France.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 8, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Asymmetric contrarian behavior in opinion dynamics disrupts the typical 50/50 balance. A slight disadvantage in contrarians can lead to winning public debates and elections, revealing complex dynamics.

Keywords:
local and global majorityopinion dynamicssociophysicstipping points

More Related Videos

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

15.7K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion
08:19

Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion

Published on: January 15, 2016

9.1K
Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

15.7K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.0K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Computational Social Science
  • Opinion Dynamics

Background:

  • The Galam model is a framework for understanding how opinions spread and change within a population.
  • Contrarian behavior, where individuals resist the majority opinion, can significantly influence group dynamics.
  • Previous models often assumed symmetric contrarian influence, potentially overlooking real-world asymmetries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of asymmetric contrarian behavior on opinion dynamics within the Galam model.
  • To explore four distinct implementation schemes for contrarian activation.
  • To analyze how asymmetries in contrarian proportions affect the emergence of consensus or polarization.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation of the Galam model with update groups of size 3.
  • Introduction of two competing opinions, A and B, with asymmetric contrarian proportions (x for A, y for B).
  • Implementation of four distinct schemes for activating contrarians, varying their timing and targets (global vs. local, majority vs. minority).

Main Results:

  • The study demonstrates the loss of the 'fifty-fifty attractor,' a state of equal opinion distribution, when contrarian behavior is asymmetric.
  • A slight reduction in contrarians on one's own side becomes a strategic advantage for winning public debates and potentially elections.
  • The phase diagram of opinion dynamics reveals numerous counterintuitive outcomes arising from these asymmetries.

Conclusions:

  • Asymmetry in contrarian influence is a critical factor in opinion dynamics, shifting the balance of power in public discourse.
  • The findings challenge the assumption of symmetry in contrarian models and highlight the importance of nuanced implementation strategies.
  • This research offers insights into factors influencing election outcomes and the spread of information in social networks.