Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics01:28

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

1.1K
Nonparametric statistics offer a powerful alternative to traditional parametric methods, useful when assumptions about the population distribution cannot be made. Unlike parametric tests, which require data to follow a specific distribution with well-defined parameters (such as the mean and standard deviation), nonparametric tests do not require such constraints. This makes them particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes, skewed data, or ordinal and categorical variables.
One of...
1.1K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

318
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
318
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA01:12

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA

1.1K
Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA, is a powerful statistical technique used to analyze parametric data, primarily in research and experimental studies. It's designed to compare the means of two or more groups, assisting researchers in identifying any significant differences between these group means. There are two main types of ANOVA based on the complexity of the analysis: one-way and two-way.
One-way ANOVA is applied when a single independent variable or factor is scrutinized. It compares...
1.1K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

387
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
387
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

4.3K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
4.3K
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

10.6K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
10.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pathogen-specific host responses define distinct pneumonia endotypes in the human lung.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Information Theoretic Methods for Variable Selection-A Review.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Searching for improvements in predicting human eye colour from DNA.

International journal of legal medicine·2021
Same author

Selection Consistency of Lasso-Based Procedures for Misspecified High-Dimensional Binary Model and Random Regressors.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

A deeper look at two concepts of measuring gene-gene interactions: logistic regression and interaction information revisited.

Genetic epidemiology·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.8K

Analysis of Information-Based Nonparametric Variable Selection Criteria.

Małgorzata Łazęcka1,2, Jan Mielniczuk1,2

  • 1Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jana Kazimierza 5, 01-248 Warsaw, Poland.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 8, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study compares feature selection methods for Generative Tree Models. Conditional Infomax Feature Extraction (CIFE) and Joint Mutual Information (JMI) may select predictors differently than Conditional Mutual Information (CMI).

Keywords:
CIFECMIJMIMarkov blanketconditional infomax feature extractionconditional mutual informationgaussian mixturegenerative tree modelinformation measuresjoint mutual information criterionnonparametric variable selection criteria

More Related Videos

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.5K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.8K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.5K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Nonparametric Generative Tree Models are complex statistical tools.
  • Selecting relevant predictors is crucial for model accuracy and interpretability.
  • Information-theoretic criteria are commonly used for feature selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the behavior of Conditional Infomax Feature Extraction (CIFE) and Joint Mutual Information (JMI) in Generative Tree Models.
  • To compare these criteria against Conditional Mutual Information (CMI).
  • To derive explicit formulas for these criteria within the generative tree model context.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated two information-based feature selection criteria: CIFE and JMI.
  • Analyzed their derivation as approximations of Conditional Mutual Information (CMI).
  • Derived explicit mathematical formulas for CMI and its approximations in generative tree models.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that CIFE and JMI can yield different predictor selection orders compared to CMI.
  • Obtained explicit analytical expressions for CMI and its approximations.
  • Derived byproduct expressions for the entropy of multivariate Gaussian mixtures and their mutual information.

Conclusions:

  • CIFE and JMI are not always interchangeable with CMI for feature selection in Generative Tree Models.
  • The derived formulas provide theoretical insights into these information-theoretic criteria.
  • The findings contribute to a better understanding of variable selection in complex generative models.