Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Loose Regulatory Standards Portend a New Era of Imprecision Oncology
1Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract:
Precision oncology has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of oncology and is a goal for cancer drug development. However, lenient drug approvals by the United States Food and Drug Administration under the auspices of precision oncology are setting up this therapeutic approach to fail. In this commentary, I review two recent FDA drug approvals (pembrolizumab for tumor mutation burden-high solid tumors and olaparib for castration-resistant prostate cancer with deleterious homologous recombination repair mutations) where the FDA indication is broader than the studied population. I explain how these broad approvals stray from principles of precision oncology and can cause harm to patients.
Insights
Lenient U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for precision oncology drugs may jeopardize this approach. Broad indications beyond studied populations risk patient harm and undermine cancer treatment advancements.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- Precision oncology aims to tailor cancer treatments to individual patient molecular profiles.
- Recent advancements in cancer drug development focus on targeted therapies.
- The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) plays a crucial role in drug approval processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze recent FDA drug approvals within the precision oncology framework.
- To evaluate whether FDA indications align with studied patient populations.
- To discuss the potential negative consequences of overly broad drug approvals.
Main Methods:
- Review of two specific FDA drug approvals: pembrolizumab and olaparib.
- Comparison of FDA-granted indications with the populations studied in clinical trials.
- Commentary on the implications of these approval decisions for precision oncology.
Main Results:
- Identified instances where FDA drug indications exceeded the scope of clinical trial populations.
- Pembrolizumab approved for tumor mutation burden-high solid tumors, broader than studied.
- Olaparib approved for castration-resistant prostate cancer with specific mutations, with a broad indication.
Conclusions:
- Broad FDA approvals can deviate from precision oncology principles.
- Overly broad indications may lead to patient harm and inappropriate treatment selection.
- Regulatory leniency in precision oncology risks undermining the field's potential.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Regulation of Expression at Multiple Steps
Loss of Tumor Suppressor Gene Functions
When the tumor suppressor genes develop mutations or are lost, cells start growing out of control, leading to cancer. However, a single functional copy of the tumor suppressor gene is enough for the cells to maintain their normal functions and cell...
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Regulation of Expression Occurs at Multiple Steps
Transcription results in the generation of precursor (pre-mRNA) that consists of both exons and introns, which needs further processing before being translated to a...

