Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

05:14
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
390
Method for IOL Power Calculation in the Second Eye of Patients With Previous Keratorefractive Surgery
Journal of Refractive Surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)
|December 9, 2020
Summary
A new Delta K method accurately calculates intraocular lens (IOL) power in the second eye after refractive surgery. This method shows improved accuracy compared to traditional formulas, making it comparable to advanced aberrometry techniques.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Refractive Surgery
- Cataract Surgery
Background:
- Calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power for the second eye in patients with prior keratorefractive surgery presents unique challenges.
- Accurate IOL power calculation is crucial for achieving desired refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in these complex cases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe and evaluate a novel method, termed the Delta K method, for calculating IOL power in the fellow eye of patients who have undergone previous keratorefractive surgery.
- To compare the efficacy of the Delta K method against established formulas and intraoperative aberrometry.
Main Methods:
- The Delta K method utilizes postoperative outcomes from the first eye to derive a 'Real K' value.
- This 'Real K' is adjusted by the difference in simulated keratometry between the two eyes to calculate the second eye's 'Real K'.
- The calculated 'Real K' is then used in the Holladay IOL Consultant software as an 'alternate K' for IOL power determination, with outcomes compared to intraoperative aberrometry, Haigis-L, and Barrett True-K No History formulas.
Main Results:
- The Delta K method demonstrated a significantly lower mean error compared to the Haigis-L and Barrett True-K No History formulas (P < .05).
- Mean absolute error for the Delta K method was significantly better than the Haigis-L formula and comparable to intraoperative aberrometry and the Barrett True-K No History formula.
- The Delta K method's performance was on par with intraoperative aberrometry regarding mean error (P = .25) and mean absolute error (P = .81).
Conclusions:
- The Delta K method provides accurate IOL power calculations for the second operative eye in patients with a history of keratorefractive surgery.
- Its mean absolute error is comparable to the Barrett True-K No History formula and intraoperative aberrometry.
- The Delta K method offers a valuable alternative for optimizing refractive outcomes in this challenging patient population.

