Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri
Published on: September 12, 2025
A comparative study between a single-dose and 24-hour multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for elective hysterectomy
Khalid Mohammed Akkour1, Maria Abdulrahim Arafah2, Mais Mohammed Alhulwah3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, King Saud University and King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. khalid.akkour@gmail.com.
Comparing antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infections (SSIs) in hysterectomy patients, this study found no significant difference between single-dose and 24-hour Cefazolin. Obesity and laparotomy were identified as key risk factors for SSIs.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Disease
- Surgical Outcomes
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Surgical site infections (SSIs) pose a significant burden on patients and healthcare systems, increasing costs and impacting patient quality of life.
- Effective prevention strategies for SSIs are crucial in surgical specialties.
- Antibiotic prophylaxis is a standard measure to reduce SSI rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of two antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for preventing SSIs in patients undergoing elective hysterectomy.
- To compare a single dose versus 24-hour multiple doses of Cefazolin for SSI prevention.
- To identify risk factors associated with the development of SSIs in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 141 patients undergoing elective hysterectomy.
- Comparison of SSI rates between patients receiving a single dose of Cefazolin versus those receiving 24-hour multiple doses.
- Analysis of potential risk factors for SSIs, including patient demographics and surgical characteristics.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in SSI rates was observed between the single-dose and 24-hour Cefazolin prophylaxis groups (p = 0.872).
- Obesity (p = 0.001) and a laparotomy surgical approach (p = 0.014) were identified as significant risk factors for developing SSIs.
- Other potential risk factors identified include prolonged hospital stay, extended surgery duration, and greater blood loss.
Conclusions:
- While the tested prophylactic regimens showed no significant difference in SSI rates, individualized risk assessment is recommended.
- Tailoring antibiotic prophylaxis based on patient risk factors and employing a multidisciplinary approach can optimize SSI prevention.
- Further research into cost-effective, patient-specific prophylactic strategies is warranted.
More Related Videos
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
03:47A Retrospective Study on Endoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Paravertebral Abscess in Spinal Tuberculosis Patients
Published on: October 25, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test