COVID-19 mortality risk assessment: An international multi-center study

Dimitris Bertsimas1,2, Galit Lukin2, Luca Mingardi1,2

  • 1Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Plos One
|December 9, 2020
PubMed

Insights

A new COVID-19 Mortality Risk (CMR) tool uses machine learning to accurately predict patient mortality. This data-driven calculator identifies high-risk individuals, improving hospital management and resource allocation for better patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of mortality risk in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is crucial for effective patient management and resource allocation.
  • Existing risk stratification tools may not fully capture the complexity of COVID-19 outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a data-driven, personalized mortality risk calculator for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
  • To leverage machine learning for accurate mortality prediction using readily available clinical data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized de-identified data from 3,927 COVID-19 positive patients across six centers and 33 hospitals.
  • Developed the COVID-19 Mortality Risk (CMR) tool using the XGBoost algorithm on a derivation cohort of 3,062 patients.
  • Validated the model's discrimination performance on three independent cohorts, evaluating Area Under the Curve (AUC).

Main Results:

  • Identified key risk factors: increased age, low oxygen saturation (≤ 93%), elevated C-reactive protein (≥ 130 mg/L), blood urea nitrogen (≥ 18 mg/dL), and creatinine (≥ 1.2 mg/dL).
  • Achieved strong predictive performance with out-of-sample AUCs of 0.90 in the derivation cohort.
  • Demonstrated robust validation with AUCs of 0.92, 0.87, and 0.81 in independent European and US patient cohorts.

Conclusions:

  • The CMR tool accurately predicts mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients using common clinical features.
  • This machine learning-based risk score is the first to be trained and validated on a combined European and US cohort.
  • The CMR tool is available as an online application and is currently in clinical use, aiding in patient management.

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
1.3K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
272
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
200
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.0K
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection01:26

Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection

The hosts' susceptibility to infection depends on several factors. The integrity of the skin and mucous membranes helps protect the body against microbial attacks. When the skin is altered, the chance of infection, limb loss, and even death increases.
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
13.1K
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
64