Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
COVID-19 mortality risk assessment: An international multi-center study
Dimitris Bertsimas1,2, Galit Lukin2, Luca Mingardi1,2
1Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Insights
A new COVID-19 Mortality Risk (CMR) tool uses machine learning to accurately predict patient mortality. This data-driven calculator identifies high-risk individuals, improving hospital management and resource allocation for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Accurate prediction of mortality risk in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is crucial for effective patient management and resource allocation.
- Existing risk stratification tools may not fully capture the complexity of COVID-19 outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a data-driven, personalized mortality risk calculator for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
- To leverage machine learning for accurate mortality prediction using readily available clinical data.
Main Methods:
- Utilized de-identified data from 3,927 COVID-19 positive patients across six centers and 33 hospitals.
- Developed the COVID-19 Mortality Risk (CMR) tool using the XGBoost algorithm on a derivation cohort of 3,062 patients.
- Validated the model's discrimination performance on three independent cohorts, evaluating Area Under the Curve (AUC).
Main Results:
- Identified key risk factors: increased age, low oxygen saturation (≤ 93%), elevated C-reactive protein (≥ 130 mg/L), blood urea nitrogen (≥ 18 mg/dL), and creatinine (≥ 1.2 mg/dL).
- Achieved strong predictive performance with out-of-sample AUCs of 0.90 in the derivation cohort.
- Demonstrated robust validation with AUCs of 0.92, 0.87, and 0.81 in independent European and US patient cohorts.
Conclusions:
- The CMR tool accurately predicts mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients using common clinical features.
- This machine learning-based risk score is the first to be trained and validated on a combined European and US cohort.
- The CMR tool is available as an online application and is currently in clinical use, aiding in patient management.
Abstract:
Timely identification of COVID-19 patients at high risk of mortality can significantly improve patient management and resource allocation within hospitals. This study seeks to develop and validate a data-driven personalized mortality risk calculator for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. De-identified data was obtained for 3,927 COVID-19 positive patients from six independent centers, comprising 33 different hospitals. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables were collected at hospital admission. The COVID-19 Mortality Risk (CMR) tool was developed using the XGBoost algorithm to predict mortality. Its discrimination performance was subsequently evaluated on three validation cohorts. The derivation cohort of 3,062 patients has an observed mortality rate of 26.84%. Increased age, decreased oxygen saturation (≤ 93%), elevated levels of C-reactive protein (≥ 130 mg/L), blood urea nitrogen (≥ 18 mg/dL), and blood creatinine (≥ 1.2 mg/dL) were identified as primary risk factors, validating clinical findings. The model obtains out-of-sample AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.94) on the derivation cohort. In the validation cohorts, the model obtains AUCs of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.88-0.95) on Seville patients, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.91) on Hellenic COVID-19 Study Group patients, and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85) on Hartford Hospital patients. The CMR tool is available as an online application at covidanalytics.io/mortality_calculator and is currently in clinical use. The CMR model leverages machine learning to generate accurate mortality predictions using commonly available clinical features. This is the first risk score trained and validated on a cohort of COVID-19 patients from Europe and the United States.
More Related Videos
08:51Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
Published on: September 20, 2024
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients