Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Excess dose-related parameters (Vex, Rex, and iRex): novel predictors and late toxicity correlations in cervical
Tissana Prasartseree1, Pittaya Dankulchai1, Peter J Hoskin2,3
1Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Purpose:
In this paper, excess dose is originally proposed to represent the dose outside the target volume that encompass only organs at risk (OARs), not the whole dose volume of isodose surface volume (ISV). By means of spatial consideration, excess dose-related parameters would also compensate inconsistent applicator positions and OARs motion, which may deviate the identical dose small-volume assumption of D2cc. Late toxicity correlations of these parameters were investigated.
Material And Methods:
A retrospective review was performed on cervical cancer high-dose-rate image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (HDR-IGABT). From ISVs of 60 to 100 Gy EQD2 (a/β = 3), excess dose-related parameters were derived as following: toxicity negligible volume (Vneg = V60 of toxicity negligible organs; high-risk clinical target volume - HR-CTV, uterus, and vagina), excess dose volume (Vex = ISV - Vneg), Vneg normalized parameters of excess dose volume ratio (Rex = Vex/Vneg), and indirect excess dose volume ratio (iRex = ISV/Vneg). Relationships between toxicity and these parameters were analyzed using a mean difference and a probit analysis method. Net reclassification indices (NRIs) were used to compare iRex60 and D2cc gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity prediction.
Results:
From 143 cases with an incidence of 34.9% and 10.5% of 3-year grade 2-4 GI and genitourinary (GU) toxicity, respectively, comparisons of means showed significant difference between grade 0-1 and 2-4 toxicities for late GI toxicity for all parameters, except ISV. There was a dose-response relationship with toxicity for each parameter across the range of 60-100 Gy EQD2. ED10 of iRex60 and iRex70 were 2.1 and 1.2, respectively. By comparing iRex60 and D2cc, additive and absolute NRIs were +6.45 and +7.69%, respectively. The reclassification significantly occurred in range of 65-75 Gy of rectum D2cc.
Conclusions:
Excess dose-related parameters, including Vex, Rex, and iRex, showed significant mean differences and parameter-toxicity relationships for late GI but not for GU toxicities. Positive NRIs suggest iRex60 utilization for spatial control of dose expansion, in addition to high-dose control with OAR small volumes. Further investigations are needed to define the optimum use of these predictors.
