Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Surgical versus Non-Surgical Management of Obstructive Sleep-disordered Breathing in Children: A Meta-analysis
Alaa Ahmed Abd El Hamid1, Anas Mohamed Askoura1, Diaa Marzouk Abdel Hamed1
1Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Insights
Surgical treatment, specifically adenotonsillectomy, significantly improved quality of life for children with obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (OSDB) compared to non-surgical options. This meta-analysis highlights surgical benefits for OSDB management.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Otolaryngology
- Sleep Medicine
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (OSDB) encompasses chronic conditions marked by repeated breathing cessations during sleep.
- OSDB leads to fatigue and daytime sleepiness, significantly impairing daily functioning and quality of life.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of surgical versus non-surgical interventions for OSDB in pediatric populations.
- To conduct a meta-analysis of clinical trials evaluating treatment outcomes for childhood OSDB.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search identified relevant studies and abstracts on surgical and non-surgical OSDB treatments in children.
- Data extraction focused on risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals from each included study.
Main Results:
- Surgically treated pediatric patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements in quality of life compared to those receiving non-surgical treatment.
- Adenotonsillectomy was identified as a key surgical intervention showing positive outcomes.
Conclusions:
- This meta-analysis indicates superior clinical improvement in the surgical (adenotonsillectomy) group versus the non-surgical group for pediatric OSDB.
- Surgical intervention positively impacts disease-specific quality of life and healthcare utilization in children with OSDB.
Background:
Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (OSDB) is a term for several chronic conditions in which partial or complete cessation of breathing occurs many times throughout the night, resulting in fatigue or daytime sleepiness that interferes with a person's functions and reduces the quality of life.
Objective:
Comparing the effectiveness of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of OSDB in children in clinical trials through a meta-analysis study.
Patients And Methods:
A number of available studies and abstracts concerning the surgical versus non-surgical treatment of OSDB in children were identified through a comprehensive search of electronic databases. Data were abstracted from every study in the form of a risk estimate and its 95% confidence interval.
Results:
The current study revealed that there was a statistically significant improvement in the surgically treated patients rather than non-surgically treated patients regarding the quality of life.
Conclusion:
The current meta-analysis reports a significant clinical improvement in the surgical (adenotonsillectomy) group as compared to the non-surgical group, in terms of disease specific quality of life, and healthcare utilization in spite of the availability of only one study.
Related Concept Videos
Sleep Apnea
The condition is more prevalent among...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation

