Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

533
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
533
Fundamental Mathematical Principles in Pharmacokinetics: Calculus and Graphs01:21

Fundamental Mathematical Principles in Pharmacokinetics: Calculus and Graphs

2.6K
The fundamental mathematical principles, such as calculus and graphs, play crucial roles in analyzing drug movement and determining pharmacokinetic parameters. Differential calculus examines rates of change and helps to determine the dissolution rate of drugs in biofluids, as well as how drug concentrations change over time. For instance, it can help calculate the rate of elimination of a drug from the body based on its concentration-time profile.
On the other hand, integral calculus focuses on...
2.6K
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview01:20

Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview

1.6K
Pharmacokinetic models utilize mathematical analysis to achieve a detailed quantitative understanding of a drug's life cycle within the body. They are instrumental in simulating a drug's pharmacokinetic parameters, predicting drug concentrations over time, optimizing dosage regimens, linking concentrations with pharmacologic activity, and estimating potential toxicity.
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
1.6K
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

227
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
227

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Repeatability of an MRI protocol for generating habitats based on cellularity, perfusion, and hypoxia in a murine model of glioma.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same author

PhenoBIC: operator-free single-cell spatial phenotyping in multiplex imaging data using deep learning of cell staining patterns.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Deep Learning-Based Synthetic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI for Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Integrating imaging and mathematical modeling to predict and optimize patient outcomes in oncology.

NPJ systems biology and applications·2026
Same author

TumorTwin: a Python framework for patient-specific digital twins in oncology.

BMC medical informatics and decision making·2026
Same author

Simulating Cancer Recurrence Patterns From Post-Treatment Viable Tumor Burden Distributions.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
08:50

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors

Published on: February 25, 2020

7.3K

Integrating Quantitative Assays with Biologically Based Mathematical Modeling for Predictive Oncology.

Anum S Kazerouni1, Manasa Gadde1,2, Andrea Gardner1

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.

Iscience
|December 10, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Biological assays are increasingly used to calibrate mechanism-based cancer models. This approach integrates experimental data, improving predictions of tumor growth and treatment response.

Keywords:
BioengineeringCancerIn Silico BiologySystems Biology

More Related Videos

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments
07:46

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments

Published on: April 30, 2021

5.1K
Measuring Growth and Gene Expression Dynamics of Tumor-Targeted S. Typhimurium Bacteria
08:11

Measuring Growth and Gene Expression Dynamics of Tumor-Targeted S. Typhimurium Bacteria

Published on: July 6, 2013

13.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
08:50

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors

Published on: February 25, 2020

7.3K
Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments
07:46

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments

Published on: April 30, 2021

5.1K
Measuring Growth and Gene Expression Dynamics of Tumor-Targeted S. Typhimurium Bacteria
08:11

Measuring Growth and Gene Expression Dynamics of Tumor-Targeted S. Typhimurium Bacteria

Published on: July 6, 2013

13.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational oncology
  • Mathematical biology
  • Cancer research

Background:

  • Mechanism-based models are gaining interest in computational oncology.
  • Quantifying parameters in these models has been historically challenging.
  • Integrating biological data can enhance model utility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of using biological assays for calibrating mechanism-based cancer models.
  • To highlight the integration of experimental data with mathematical models.
  • To improve predictions of tumor growth and treatment response.

Main Methods:

  • Summarizing experimental methods for quantifying tumor characteristics (molecular to tissue scales).
  • Describing the direct integration of quantitative measurements (e.g., RNA sequencing, microscopy, in vivo imaging) with mechanism-based models.
  • Reviewing approaches for model calibration and initialization.

Main Results:

  • Biological assays provide quantitative measurements crucial for model calibration.
  • Integration of diverse experimental data scales (molecular to tissue) is feasible.
  • Calibrated models offer improved predictions for tumor growth and treatment response.

Conclusions:

  • Biological assay data is essential for initializing and calibrating mechanism-based cancer models.
  • This integration enhances the predictive power of computational oncology models.
  • Mechanism-based models, when informed by experimental data, can guide cancer research and treatment strategies.