Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

14.9K
Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
14.9K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

18.4K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.4K
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs01:05

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs

17.4K
A single nucleotide polymorphism or SNP is a single nucleotide variation at a specific genomic position in a large population. It is the most prevalent type of sequence variation found in the human genome. Point mutations that occur in more than 1% of the population qualify as SNPs. These are present once every 1000 nucleotides on an average in the human genome. Replacement of a purine with another purine (A/G) or a pyrimidine with another pyrimidine (C/T) is known as a transition. In contrast,...
17.4K
Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

5.3K
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
5.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Germline Cancer Testing in Unselected Patients With Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Multi-center Prospective Study.

Pancreas·2026
Same author

Sensitivity of HiFi long-read genome sequencing for difficult-to-detect pathogenic variants when applied to real-world clinical laboratory samples.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same author

A scalable approach to resolving variants of uncertain significance.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Implementation of First-Line Rapid Genome Sequencing for Children in Pediatric and Cardiac Intensive Care Units.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2026
Same author

Multiscore, a gene ranker powered by artificial intelligence and real-world clinical data, shows high sensitivity for the molecular diagnosis of Mendelian disorders in nearly 10,000 exomes and genomes.

Human genetics·2026
Same author

Authors' Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Stimac and Bayley: Utilization of Cancer Screening, Prevention, and Treatment in Women With Variants of Uncertain Significance in Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2026
Same journal

MCFST: Spatial domain identification method based on multi-view graph convolutional network and graph fusion network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaBiT: Enhancing Spatial Transcriptomics Resolution via Bidirectional Attention Transformers.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

EDEL: Enhancing Dense Retrievers for Curation of Biomedical Knowledge Bases.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Informative Relational Learning for Adverse Reaction Prediction with Enhanced Generalization to Novel Drugs.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

An interpretable deep learning framework uncovers features governing CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing efficiency.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

3DICE: Interpretable 3D Cross-Modal Learning for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction and Large-Scale Drug Discovery.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

13.3K

Prioritizing genes for systematic variant effect mapping.

Da Kuang1,2,3,4, Rebecca Truty5, Jochen Weile1,2,3,4

  • 1Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E1, Canada.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|December 10, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Prioritizing genes for functional testing is crucial for classifying variants of uncertain significance (VUS). This study developed a novel gene prioritization strategy to maximize the clinical impact of variant effect maps.

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.4K
A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
05:51

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

Published on: June 15, 2011

26.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

13.3K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.4K
A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
05:51

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

Published on: June 15, 2011

26.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Clinical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Most rare missense variants are classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) due to lack of functional data.
  • Functional assays, like multiplexed assays of variant effect (MAVE), can generate variant effect maps but prioritization of targets has been suboptimal.
  • There is a need to prioritize genes for MAVE to maximize clinical impact on variant interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply a systematic strategy for prioritizing genes for functional testing of missense variation.
  • To guide the generation of variant effect maps towards proteins with the greatest clinical utility.
  • To improve the interpretation of rare missense variants in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • Mined databases of clinically interpreted variants (e.g., ClinVar) to identify genes with numerous missense VUS.
  • Applied three sequential prioritization strategies: (i) number of unique missense VUS, (ii) movability- and reappearance-weighted impact scores, and (iii) difficulty-adjusted impact scores.
  • Ranked genes based on these combined metrics to identify optimal targets for systematic functional testing.

Main Results:

  • Developed a robust, multi-strategy approach to rank genes for functional variant effect mapping.
  • The prioritization strategies effectively identify genes where functional testing would have the greatest impact on clinical variant interpretation.
  • The methodology provides a framework for resource allocation in functional genomics studies.

Conclusions:

  • This gene prioritization framework enables more impactful functional testing of missense variants.
  • The approach aims to accelerate the classification of VUS, thereby improving genetic diagnostics.
  • The source code is publicly available to facilitate broader application in the research community.