Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

36.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
36.2K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.5K
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

222
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
222
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

1.4K
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
1.4K
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

1.6K
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
1.6K
Requirements for Human Life01:26

Requirements for Human Life

12.1K
The Earth and its atmosphere have provided humans with air, water, and food, but these are not the only requirements for survival. Humans also require a specific range of temperature and pressure that the Earth and its atmosphere provides.
Oxygen
Atmospheric air is only about 20 percent oxygen, but that oxygen is a key component of the chemical reactions that keep the body alive, including the reactions that produce ATP. Brain cells are susceptible to a lack of oxygen because they require a...
12.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How to use freedom of information request data for nursing research.

Evidence-based nursing·2026
Same author

Correspondence on "defining 'abortion'": response to Sakr.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same author

Registers and quotas: strengthening conscientious objection policy in healthcare.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same author

Abortion and Infant Mortality: Termination Does Not Prevent Death.

The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body·2026
Same author

Reconsidering the impairment argument against abortion.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2025
Same author

Clearing the air on surgical smoke: Why National Health Service trusts must act.

Journal of perioperative practice·2025
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Isolation of Leukocytes from the Murine Tissues at the Maternal-Fetal Interface
07:51

Isolation of Leukocytes from the Murine Tissues at the Maternal-Fetal Interface

Published on: May 21, 2015

17.7K

Prolife hypocrisy: why inconsistency arguments do not matter.

Nicholas Colgrove1, Bruce Philip Blackshaw2, Daniel Rodger3

  • 1Philosophy Department and the Center for Bioethics, Health & Society, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA colgron@wfu.edu.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|December 11, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Inconsistency arguments against abortion opponents are flawed, failing to consider diverse beliefs and actions. Focusing on the arguments, not the people, offers a more productive ethical discussion.

Keywords:
abortionembryos and fetusesmoral statuspersonsreproductive medicine

More Related Videos

Double In Utero Electroporation to Target Temporally and Spatially Separated Cell Populations
10:45

Double In Utero Electroporation to Target Temporally and Spatially Separated Cell Populations

Published on: June 14, 2020

7.7K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Isolation of Leukocytes from the Murine Tissues at the Maternal-Fetal Interface
07:51

Isolation of Leukocytes from the Murine Tissues at the Maternal-Fetal Interface

Published on: May 21, 2015

17.7K
Double In Utero Electroporation to Target Temporally and Spatially Separated Cell Populations
10:45

Double In Utero Electroporation to Target Temporally and Spatially Separated Cell Populations

Published on: June 14, 2020

7.7K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.0K

Area of Science:

  • Ethics
  • Philosophy of Action
  • Social Science

Background:

  • Arguments questioning the consistency of abortion opponents are common.
  • These 'inconsistency arguments' often allege hypocrisy regarding beliefs and actions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the systematic failure of inconsistency arguments against abortion opponents.
  • To identify the common flaws and limitations of such arguments.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the structure and assumptions of inconsistency arguments.
  • Examination of how these arguments address diversity among abortion opponents.
  • Evaluation of the impact of inconsistency arguments on ethical discourse.

Main Results:

  • Inconsistency arguments fail to account for the diversity of beliefs and actions among abortion opponents.
  • These arguments often rely on isolated beliefs and ignore varied practical applications.
  • Critiques based on inconsistency do not threaten the core moral beliefs of opponents.
  • Even successful inconsistency arguments can have negative consequences, promoting harmful practices or worsening societal outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Inconsistency arguments against abortion opponents are fundamentally flawed and ineffective.
  • A more constructive approach involves engaging with the substantive arguments made by abortion opponents, rather than criticizing their perceived inconsistencies.
  • Shifting focus from individuals to their arguments can foster more meaningful ethical debate.