Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Subcutaneous Infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus MRSA
Published on: February 9, 2011
Single-stage revision of MRSA orthopedic device-related infection in sheep with an antibiotic-loaded hydrogel
Andrew L Foster1,2,3, Willemijn Boot1, Valentina Stenger1
1AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Abstract:
Local antimicrobial therapy is an integral aspect of treating orthopedic device-related infection (ODRI), which is conventionally administered via polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. PMMA, however, is limited by a suboptimal antibiotic release profile and a lack of biodegradability. In this study, we compare the efficacy of PMMA versus an antibiotic-loaded hydrogel in a single-stage revision for chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ODRI in sheep. Antibiofilm activity of the antibiotic combination (gentamicin and vancomycin) was determined in vitro. Swiss alpine sheep underwent a single-stage revision of a tibial intramedullary nail with MRSA infection. Local gentamicin and vancomycin therapy was delivered via hydrogel or PMMA (n = 5 per group), in conjunction with systemic antibiotic therapy. In vivo observations included: local antibiotic tissue concentration, renal and liver function tests, and quantitative microbiology on tissues and hardware post-mortem. There was a nonsignificant reduction in biofilm with an increasing antibiotic concentration in vitro (p = 0.12), confirming the antibiotic tolerance of the MRSA biofilm. In the in vivo study, four out of five sheep from each treatment group were culture-negative. Antibiotic delivery via hydrogel resulted in 10-100 times greater local concentrations for the first 2-3 days compared with PMMA and were comparable thereafter. Systemic concentrations of gentamicin were minimal or undetectable in both groups, while renal and liver function tests were within normal limits. This study shows that a single-stage revision with hydrogel or PMMA is equally effective, although the hydrogel offers certain practical benefits over PMMA, which make it an attractive proposition for clinical use.
Insights
This study compared polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement with antibiotic-loaded hydrogel for treating orthopedic device-related infections (ODRI). Both methods were equally effective in sheep, but hydrogel offered better initial antibiotic release and practical advantages.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Infectious Diseases
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Orthopedic device-related infections (ODRI) are challenging to treat.
- Conventional local antimicrobial therapy uses polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement.
- PMMA has limitations including suboptimal antibiotic release and lack of biodegradability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of antibiotic-loaded hydrogel versus PMMA for single-stage revision of chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ODRI in a sheep model.
- To evaluate antibiotic delivery, tissue concentration, and clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- In vitro assessment of antibiotic combination (gentamicin and vancomycin) against MRSA biofilm.
- In vivo study in Swiss alpine sheep with MRSA-infected tibial intramedullary nails.
- Single-stage revision using local gentamicin and vancomycin delivered via hydrogel or PMMA, alongside systemic antibiotics.
Main Results:
- In vitro, MRSA biofilm showed antibiotic tolerance.
- In vivo, 4 out of 5 sheep in both hydrogel and PMMA groups were culture-negative.
- Hydrogel provided 10-100 times higher local antibiotic concentrations initially compared to PMMA.
- Systemic antibiotic levels were minimal, and organ function remained normal.
Conclusions:
- Single-stage revision using either hydrogel or PMMA is equally effective for MRSA ODRI in this sheep model.
- Antibiotic-loaded hydrogel demonstrates superior initial local antibiotic delivery and practical benefits over PMMA.
- Hydrogel presents an attractive alternative for clinical application in ODRI treatment.

