Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Identification of copy number variants by NGS-based NIPT at low sequencing depth
Xiaoqing Ye1, Shengmou Lin2, Xiwei Song3
1Department of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; The Medical Centre for Critical Pregnant Women in Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510150, China; Key Laboratory for Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, China.
Objective:
To explore the clinical utility of detecting chromosome copy number variants (CNVs) in the fetus by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using the low-pass whole-genome sequencing.
Methods:
Eight hundred and seventy-three singleton pregnancies with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) available between January 2017 to December 2019 and stored enough plasma sample for NIPT testing were included in this study. The CMA results show that forty-eight pregnancies with CNVs and eight hundred and twenty-five pregnancies are normal. Each pregnancy's plasma sample was blindly tested with NIPT at a depth of 0.51-1.19x for CNVs detection. The performance of the NIPT method for CNVs detection compared with the CMA method is evaluated.
Results:
A total of fifty-two CNVs ranging from 0.1-47.3 Mb identified in forty-eight samples were identified by NIPT, of which thirty-four CNVs were consistent with CMA results. Additionally, eighteen CNVs were missed by NIPT. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CNVs were 65.38% (95% CI: 51.76%-76.89%) and 97.45% (95% CI: 96.12%-98.35%), respectively. However, for the detection of CNVs larger than 2 Mb and CNVs less than 2Mb, the sensitivities were 81.58% (95% CI: 66.27%-91.09%) and 21.43% (95% CI: 6.84%-48.32%), respectively.
Conclusion:
Our study demonstrated that the NIPT might be an alternative method for screening CNVs comparable with other studies. However, CNVs less than 2Mb in length shows poor sensitivity by NIPT. Noninvasive CNVs detection based on the NIPT method still needs more clinical validation studies and technical improvement to achieve clinically acceptable accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
RNA-seq
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...

