Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Anatomy of the Ear01:16

Anatomy of the Ear

10.4K
Auditory sensation, commonly called hearing, involves the transformation of sonic waves into neural impulses facilitated by the structures of the auditory organ. The prominent, flesh-like structure on the side of the head, called the auricle, directs sound waves towards the auditory canal. The auricle is often mislabeled as the pinna, a term more aligned with mobile structures like a feline's external ear. The auditory canal penetrates the cranium via the external auditory meatus of the...
10.4K
The Auditory Ossicles01:11

The Auditory Ossicles

2.6K
The auditory ossicles of the middle ear transmit sounds from the air as vibrations to the fluid-filled cochlea. The auditory ossicles consist of two malleus (hammer) bones, two incus (anvil) bones, and two stapes (stirrups), one on each side. These bones develop during the fetal stage and are the ones to ossify first. They are fully mature at birth and do not grow afterward.
The aptly named stapes look very much like a stirrup. The three ossicles are unique to mammals, and each plays a role in...
2.6K
The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

49.1K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
49.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When dinosaurs hear like barn owls: pitfalls and caveats in assessing hearing in dinosaurs.

Biology letters·2025
Same author

Auditory cellular cooperativity probed via spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Biophysical journal·2025
Same author

Music to my ears.

Hearing research·2025
Same author

Conditions Underlying the Appearance of Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions in Mammals.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2024
Same author

Otoacoustic emissions in African mole-rats.

Hearing research·2024
Same author

Otoacoustic Emissions in Non-Mammals.

Audiology research·2022
Same journal

Effects of early hearing deficits on olivocochlear efferent neuron morphology in mice.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Cochlear aging after synaptopathic noise: age-noise interactions in hair cell loss and axonal degeneration.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

MERGE: Misophonia and emotion regulation in a guided experience sampling study.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Repopulating microglia recapitulate developmental characteristics during a period of auditory circuit recovery.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Deficits in tail-lift and air-righting reflexes in rats after ototoxicity associate with loss of vestibular type I hair cells.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Slc16a5 (MCT6) knockout induces sex-dependent changes in auditory function, hair cell viability and cochlear transcriptomic programs in the mouse.

Hearing research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 26, 2025

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited
07:35

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited

Published on: February 16, 2022

2.7K

An evolutionary approach to middle-ear prostheses.

Geoffrey A Manley1

  • 1Cochlear and Auditory Brainstem Physiology, Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.

Hearing Research
|December 14, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mammalian middle ear prostheses should consider the evolutionary equivalence and flexibility of single-ossicle designs. These findings support the continued use of single-ossicle prostheses, challenging the notion of three-ossicle superiority.

Keywords:
Area ratioColumellaCurved-membrane effectImpedance matchingLever ratioSingle ossicleThree ossicles

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration
09:07

Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration

Published on: January 26, 2024

3.0K
Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 26, 2025

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited
07:35

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited

Published on: February 16, 2022

2.7K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration
09:07

Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration

Published on: January 26, 2024

3.0K
Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Bioengineering
  • Otolaryngology

Background:

  • The prevailing assumption that three-ossicle mammalian middle ears are inherently superior to single-ossicle ones has historically guided the development of auditory prostheses.
  • This misconception has influenced research and clinical applications, potentially overlooking the functional capabilities of simpler auditory structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the functional equivalence and biomechanical advantages of single-ossicle versus three-ossicle mammalian middle ear structures.
  • To reassess the established paradigms in auditory prosthesis design based on evolutionary evidence and empirical measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of evolutionary data pertaining to middle ear ossicle configurations across mammalian species.
  • Biomechanical measurements and functional assessments of both single-ossicle and three-ossicle middle ear models.

Main Results:

  • Evolutionary evidence and biomechanical data demonstrate that single-ossicle middle ears are functionally equivalent and exhibit greater flexibility compared to three-ossicle designs.
  • The presumed superiority of the three-ossicle system is not supported by objective scientific evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • The functional equivalence and inherent flexibility of single-ossicle middle ear structures challenge long-held assumptions in auditory research.
  • These findings advocate for the continued consideration and application of single-ossicle designs in the development of auditory prostheses, irrespective of advancements in reconstructive technologies.