Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Antimicrobial consumption: Comparison of three different data collection methods.
Valerie-Beau Pucken1, Michèle Bodmer1, Benjamin Lovis1
1Clinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Data collection methods for antimicrobial use in dairy farms show inconsistencies. Veterinary software and discarded drug packages (garbage) captured more data than treatment journals, highlighting the need for standardized antimicrobial surveillance.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Medicine
- Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance
- Animal Health Economics
Background:
- Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global health concern.
- Effective surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in animals is crucial for AMR control.
- Current data collection methods for antimicrobial use in dairy farms may lack consistency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To longitudinally compare the consistency of antimicrobial consumption data across three distinct collection methods.
- To evaluate data completeness and variety from veterinary software, farm treatment journals, and discarded drug packages.
- To identify the most reliable method for quantifying antimicrobial use in dairy cattle.
Main Methods:
- A 18-month longitudinal study involving 20 veterinary practices and 92 dairy farms.
- Compared data from veterinary software, farm treatment journals (analyzed with and without dosage supplementation), and discarded drug packages (garbage).
- Analyzed intramammary (lactation and dry-off) and systemic antimicrobial use, comparing quantities (injectors, active substances) and treatment incidences.
Main Results:
- Veterinary software data yielded the highest quantities of antimicrobials for all treatment types (intramammary and systemic).
- Treatment journals with only complete entries provided the lowest data yield.
- Software and garbage data showed moderate agreement for intramammary treatments (56.1% for injectors); garbage revealed the widest variety of intramammary products, while software captured the most systemic products.
Conclusions:
- Significant data inconsistencies exist between veterinary software, treatment journals, and garbage data for antimicrobial consumption.
- No single method captured complete antimicrobial usage data on participating farms.
- Standardized systems are essential for accurate quantification and assessment of antimicrobial consumption at veterinary practice and farm levels.
More Related Videos
12:03Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
08:30One-day Workflow Scheme for Bacterial Pathogen Detection and Antimicrobial Resistance Testing from Blood Cultures
Published on: July 9, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods