Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Medical therapy vs early revascularization in diabetics with chronic total occlusions: A meta-analysis and systematic
Muhammad Shayan Khan1, Farhad Sami2, Hemindermeet Singh3
1Internal Medicine, Mercy Saint Vincent Medical Centre, Toledo, OH 43608, United States. muhammadshayankhan1@gmail.com.
Insights
Early revascularization (ER) shows a trend toward improved outcomes for diabetic patients with chronic total occlusions (CTO) compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT). ER may reduce mortality, though repeat myocardial infarction risk was similar between treatments.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Diabetology
Background:
- Management of chronic total occlusions (CTO) in diabetic patients presents challenges.
- A shift towards early revascularization (ER) over optimal medical therapy (OMT) is observed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare long-term clinical outcomes, morbidity, and mortality between OMT and ER in diabetic patients with CTOs.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of ER versus OMT in managing diabetic CTOs.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trials (RCTs and observational studies) was conducted.
- Pooled hazard ratios (HR) were computed using a random effects model.
- Primary outcome was all-cause death; secondary outcomes included cardiac death, repeat revascularization, and myocardial infarction.
Main Results:
- OMT was associated with a trend towards higher all-cause and cardiac mortality compared to ER (P=0.11 and P=0.07, respectively).
- The risk of repeat myocardial infarction was similar between OMT and ER (HR: 0.97).
- Patients on OMT had a significantly higher risk of repeat revascularization (HR: 1.62, P < 0.00001).
Conclusions:
- Early revascularization (ER) demonstrates a trend towards improved outcomes in diabetic patients with CTOs compared to OMT.
- Subgroup analysis of OMT versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reinforced these findings, showing higher mortality with OMT.
- ER may be a beneficial strategy for managing diabetic CTOs, warranting further investigation.
Background:
Management of chronic total occlusions (CTO) in diabetics is challenging, with a recent trend towards early revascularization [ER: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and bypass grafting] instead of optimal medical therapy (OMT). We hypothesize that ER improves morbidity and mortality outcomes in diabetic patients with CTOs as compared to OMT.
Aim:
To determine the long term clinical outcomes and to compare morbidity and mortality between OMT and ER in diabetic patients with CTOs.
Methods:
Potentially relevant published clinical trials were identified in Medline, Embase, chemical abstracts and Biosis (from start of the databases till date) and pooled hazard ratios (HR) computed using a random effects model, with significant P value < 0.05. Primary outcome of interest was all-cause death. Secondary outcomes included cardiac death, prompt revascularization (ER) or repeat myocardial infarction (MI). Due to scarcity of data, both Randomized control trials and observational studies were included. 4 eligible articles, containing 2248 patients were identified (1252 in OMT and 1196 in ER). Mean follow-up was 45-60 mo.
Results:
OMT was associated with a higher all-cause mortality [HR: 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-3.26, P = 0.11] and cardiac mortality (HR: 1.68, 95%CI: 0.96-2.96, P = 0.07). Results were close to significance. The risk of repeat MI was almost the same in both groups (HR: 0.97, 95%CI: 0.61-1.54, P = 0.90). Similarly, patients assigned to OMT had a higher risk of repeat revascularization (HR: 1.62, 95%CI: 1.36-1.94, P < 0.00001). Sub-group analysis of OMT vs PCI demonstrated higher all-cause (HR: 1.98, 95%CI: 1.36-2.87, P = 0.0003) and cardiac mortality (HR: 1.87, 95%CI: 0.96-3.62, P = 0.06) in the OMT group. The risk of repeat MI was low in the OMT group vs PCI (HR: 0.53, 95%CI: 0.31-0.91, P = 0.02). Data on repeat revascularization revealed no difference between the two (HR: 1.00, 95%CI: 0.52-1.93, P = 1.00).
Conclusion:
In diabetic patients with CTO, there was a trend for improved outcomes with ER regarding all-cause and cardiac death as compared to OMT. These findings were reinforced with statistical significance on subgroup analysis of OMT vs PCI.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
13:18Optimization of the Longa Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Method for Complete Reperfusion
Published on: November 22, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Angina IV: Management
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...