Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 26, 2025

A 3D Organotypic Melanoma Spheroid Skin Model
Published on: May 18, 2018
Mitogen-activated protein kinase blockade in melanoma: intermittent versus continuous therapy, from preclinical to
Pauline Tétu1, Laetitia Vercellino2, Coralie Reger de Moura3
1APHP Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Paris 7 Diderot University, INSERM U976, Hôpital Saint-Louis.
Purpose Of Review:
Although targeted therapy provides a high response rate and rapid disease control in advanced melanoma, most patients experience disease progression due to acquired resistance mechanisms leading to reactivation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. The purpose of this article is to review the recently published data on the impact of an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule of BRAF and MEK inhibition in advanced melanoma to determine the best approach in clinical practice.
Recent Findings:
Some preclinical studies have highlighted the concept that drug-resistant cells may also display drug dependency, such that intermittent dosing of targeted therapy may prevent the emergence of lethal drug resistance. Moreover, clinical observations have suggested that repeated treatment after a break or an intervening therapy may provide clinical benefit. However, recent preclinical and clinical studies have also failed to demonstrate an advantage of intermittent dosing and showed a similar efficacy of the intermittent versus continuous regimens of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in mice models and phase 2 clinical trial.
Summary:
Owing to these discordant results, continuous dosing of BRAF and MEK inhibitors remains the optimal therapeutic approach until additional clinical data demonstrate the superiority of another combination or dosing regimen.
Insights
Continuous dosing of BRAF and MEK inhibitors is recommended for advanced melanoma. Current data suggest continuous therapy is as effective as intermittent dosing, with no clear advantage for alternating treatment schedules.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Dermatology
Background:
- Advanced melanoma treatment often involves targeted therapies like BRAF and MEK inhibitors.
- Acquired resistance mechanisms, particularly MAPK pathway reactivation, lead to disease progression despite initial high response rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review recent data comparing intermittent versus continuous dosing of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in advanced melanoma.
- To determine the optimal dosing schedule for clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Review of preclinical studies and clinical trials (Phase 2).
- Analysis of data on BRAF and MEK inhibitor efficacy and resistance mechanisms.
- Comparison of intermittent versus continuous dosing regimens.
Main Results:
- Preclinical studies suggested intermittent dosing might prevent resistance by exploiting drug dependency.
- Clinical observations hinted at potential benefits from interrupted treatment.
- However, recent preclinical and clinical studies showed similar efficacy for both intermittent and continuous BRAF and MEK inhibitor regimens.
Conclusions:
- Discordant results exist regarding the efficacy of intermittent versus continuous dosing.
- Continuous dosing of BRAF and MEK inhibitors is currently the optimal approach for advanced melanoma.
- Further clinical data are needed to evaluate alternative dosing strategies.
Related Concept Videos
MAPK Signaling Cascades
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Inhibition of Cdk Activity

