Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

Actuarial Approach

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Update on Rehabilitation After Stroke: Global Changes and the Continued Importance of Therapy Intensity, Dose, and Timing.

Stroke·2026

Same author

Reverse engineering of motor unit discharge in multiple sclerosis reveals heterogeneity of voluntary motor commands.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Same author

A Sudden Decline in Global Stroke Rehabilitation Randomized Controlled Trials and Female Enrollment Associated With the COVID-19 Pandemic.

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation·2026

Same author

Evaluating the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of markerless motion capture for static postural control assessment.

Journal of biomechanics·2026

Same author

Reducing robotic upper-limb assessment time while maintaining precision: a time series foundation model approach.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026

Same author

RObotic WAlking for children who CAnnot WAlk (RoWaCaWa): feasibility and family impacts and perspectives of a family-led intervention.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

Statistical Considerations for Drawing Conclusions About Recovery.

Keith R Lohse¹, Rachel L Hawe², Sean P Dukelow²

¹University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

|December 15, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical methods used to analyze stroke recovery can create illusions of proportional recovery. Researchers must carefully consider analytical issues and measurement tools to accurately assess recovery trajectories.

Keywords:

data analysis methods rehabilitation stroke

More Related Videos

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface

Published on: August 11, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface

Published on: August 11, 2017

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Rehabilitation Science
Biostatistics

Background:

Studies on stroke recovery often analyze change scores regressed on initial impairments, reporting consistent associations (slopes ≈ 0.7).
However, statistical limitations in these analyses restrict definitive conclusions about stroke recovery patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a checklist of conceptual and analytical challenges in longitudinal stroke recovery research.
To illustrate these issues using proportional recovery as an example, applicable to broader longitudinal studies.

Main Methods:

Simulations were performed on a dataset of 373 Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity scores.
Key considerations examined include problematic change score analyses, null-hypothesis significance testing, and scale boundary effects on proportionality.

Main Results:

Simulations revealed limitations in common recovery analysis methods, showing uniform recovery can mimic proportional recovery patterns.
Group-level statistics and individual classifications, often cited as evidence for proportional recovery, can be misleading.

Conclusions:

Current common methods are insufficient to determine the validity of proportional recovery.
Measurement tools and analytical techniques, including post hoc classifications, can generate spurious findings, necessitating careful consideration in future stroke recovery research.