Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Francisco Javier León Correa

    Journal International De Bioethique Et D'Ethique Des Sciences
    |December 15, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study explores the ethical roots of the global ecological crisis, critiquing modern instrumental reason. It proposes bioethical frameworks like dialogic ethics for sustainable environmental duties.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [The abortion from bioethics: autonomy of woman and physician?].

    Cuadernos de bioetica : revista oficial de la Asociacion Espanola de Bioetica y Etica Medica·2010
    Same author

    [From clinical to social bioethics in Chile].

    Revista medica de Chile·2008
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Environmental Ethics
    • Modern Philosophy
    • Bioethics

    Background:

    • The current global ecological crisis stems from ethical deficiencies.
    • Modernity's instrumental reason is a key contributing factor.
    • Critiques from ecological ethics and feminism highlight these issues.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify the ethical causes of the global ecological crisis.
    • To evaluate the utility of various ethical frameworks in addressing this crisis.
    • To propose foundations for ethical duties towards nature and other living beings.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of philosophical and ethical theories.
    • Examination of critiques from ecological ethics and feminism.
    • Exploration of bioethical approaches.

    Main Results:

    • Instrumental reason, utilitarianism, and radical neoliberalism are inadequate for solving the ecological crisis.
    • Existing ethical frameworks fail to establish duties towards nature.
    • Bioethical approaches offer potential solutions.

    Conclusions:

    • A bioethical approach is necessary to resolve the ecological crisis.
    • Dialogic ethics, neo-Aristotelian perspective, and personalism offer promising foundations for ethical duties to nature.
    • Universal rationality can be achieved through these ethical frameworks.

    Related Experiment Videos