Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Genetic Manipulation of the Plant Pathogen Ustilago maydis to Study Fungal Biology and Plant Microbe Interactions
Published on: September 30, 2016
A Noncanonical DNA Damage Checkpoint Response in a Major Fungal Pathogen
Erika Shor1,2, Rocio Garcia-Rubio3, Lucius DeGregorio3
1Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, New Jersey, USA erika.shor@hmh-cdi.org david.perlin@hmh-cdi.org.
Abstract:
DNA damage checkpoints are key guardians of genome integrity. Eukaryotic cells respond to DNA damage by triggering extensive phosphorylation of Rad53/CHK2 effector kinase, whereupon activated Rad53/CHK2 mediates further aspects of checkpoint activation, including cell cycle arrest and transcriptional changes. Budding yeast Candida glabrata, closely related to model eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is an opportunistic pathogen characterized by high genetic diversity and rapid emergence of drug-resistant mutants. However, the mechanisms underlying this genetic variability are unclear. We used Western blotting and mass spectrometry to show that, unlike S. cerevisiae, C. glabrata cells exposed to DNA damage did not induce C. glabrata Rad53 (CgRad53) phosphorylation. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis showed that, unlike S. cerevisiae, C. glabrata cells did not accumulate in S phase upon DNA damage. Consistent with these observations, time-lapse microscopy showed C. glabrata cells continuing to divide in the presence of DNA damage, resulting in mitotic errors and cell death. Finally, transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq) analysis revealed transcriptional rewiring of the DNA damage response in C. glabrata and identified several key protectors of genome stability upregulated by DNA damage in S. cerevisiae but downregulated in C. glabrata, including proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Together, our results reveal a noncanonical fungal DNA damage response in C. glabrata, which may contribute to rapidly generating genetic change and drug resistance.IMPORTANCE In order to preserve genome integrity, all cells must mount appropriate responses to DNA damage, including slowing down or arresting the cell cycle to give the cells time to repair the damage and changing gene expression, for example to induce genes involved in DNA repair. The Rad53 protein kinase is a conserved central mediator of these responses in eukaryotic cells, and its extensive phosphorylation upon DNA damage is necessary for its activation and subsequent activity. Interestingly, here we show that in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida glabrata, Rad53 phosphorylation is not induced by DNA damage, nor do these cells arrest in S phase under these conditions, in contrast to the closely related yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Instead, C. glabrata cells continue to divide in the presence of DNA damage, resulting in significant cell lethality. Finally, we show that a number of genes involved in DNA repair are strongly induced by DNA damage in S. cerevisiae but repressed in C. glabrata Together, these findings shed new light on mechanisms regulating genome stability in fungal pathogens.
Insights
Candida glabrata exhibits a noncanonical DNA damage response, failing to phosphorylate Rad53 or arrest cell division, unlike Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This leads to genomic instability and potential drug resistance.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Mycology
Background:
- DNA damage checkpoints are crucial for maintaining genome integrity in eukaryotic cells.
- Rad53/CHK2 effector kinase activation via phosphorylation is a conserved mediator of DNA damage response, including cell cycle arrest and transcriptional changes.
- Candida glabrata, an opportunistic fungal pathogen, displays high genetic diversity and rapid drug resistance emergence, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the DNA damage response mechanisms in Candida glabrata, particularly focusing on Rad53 activation and cell cycle control.
- To compare the DNA damage response of C. glabrata with that of the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
- To elucidate potential mechanisms contributing to C. glabrata's genetic variability and drug resistance.
Main Methods:
- Western blotting and mass spectrometry to assess Rad53 phosphorylation.
- Flow cytometry to analyze cell cycle progression upon DNA damage.
- Time-lapse microscopy to observe cell division dynamics in the presence of DNA damage.
- Transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq) to analyze differential gene expression.
Main Results:
- Unlike S. cerevisiae, C. glabrata did not exhibit CgRad53 phosphorylation upon exposure to DNA damage.
- C. glabrata cells did not arrest in S phase following DNA damage and continued to divide, leading to mitotic errors and cell death.
- Transcriptome analysis revealed a rewiring of the DNA damage response, with key genome stability protectors like PCNA downregulated in C. glabrata, contrasting with S. cerevisiae.
Conclusions:
- Candida glabrata possesses a noncanonical DNA damage response pathway.
- The absence of Rad53 activation and cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage may contribute to C. glabrata's high genetic variability.
- This unique DNA damage response mechanism in C. glabrata could be linked to the rapid emergence of drug resistance in this opportunistic pathogen.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle
Restarting Stalled Replication Forks
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Homologous Recombination

